Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

The Movement Strategy in Taiwan’s Judicial Independence Reform

Contents:

Author Info

  • Chin-shou Wang

    ()

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Judicial independence reform in Taiwan was pioneered by a group of reform-spirited judges from Room 303 of the Taichung (å°ä¸­, Taizhong) District Court, in 1993. Rather than joining the mass movement that was unfolding on the streets, the reformers formed a coalition with other judges to trigger reform from within the judiciary. The reformers appealed to the rule of law and democracy as a movement strategy for mobilization. As a result, the movement strategy turned out to be a great success, and Room 303 became the chief engine for further judicial reforms in subsequent years. However, the movement strategy in itself also presents some limitations. This paper examines why the movement strategy was successful and how its limitations eventually created problems that hinder further judicial reforms in Taiwan.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jcca/article/view/305
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg in its journal Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell.

    Volume (Year): 39 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 125-147

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:gig:chaktu:v:39:y:2010:i:3:p:125-147

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Neuer Jungfernstieg 21, D-20354 Hamburg
    Phone: +49 (0)40 42825-593
    Fax: +49 (0)40 42825-547
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.currentchineseaffairs.org
    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information:
    Email:
    Web: http://www.giga-hamburg.de/china-aktuell

    Related research

    Keywords: Taiwan; judicial assistance; social/political movements; rule of law; democracy; judicial independence reform; movement strategy;

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:chaktu:v:39:y:2010:i:3:p:125-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Karsten Giese) or (Heike Holbig).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.