IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gig/afjour/v34y1999i1p59-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selbstjustiz in Benin. Zur Debatte über den Charakter außerstaatlicher Sanktionsformen in Afrika

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Paulenz

Abstract

A particular practice of arbitrary law has become common in Benin in the 1990s, usually exacted in cases of theft by unorganised assemblages of people. The author situates this phenomenon in the context of a practice of extra-legal justice (i.e. justice as practised outside the realm of the state), generally marked by an increase in crimes against property and by a growth of violent forms of reaction towards such crimes. The reason behind this tendency is neither to be found in the suppression of "traditional", i.e. pre-colonial law, as is sometimes argued by "traditionalistic" positions in African legal studies; nor can extra-legal justice, as practised today, be understood to have emerged from "African tradition", as a "modernistic" point of view may have it. Pre-colonial practices of justice are difficult to reconstruct, but they probably varied considerably; thus it is meaningless to speak of "traditional sanctions". The author identifies a number of social and political factors that have functionally transformed legal practice: the most important among them are the emergence of a commodity economy, urbanisation, and the failure of the neopatrimonial state to enact the rule of law. Thus, today's extra-legal sanction practices are resulting from contemporary Benin society, rather than from the suppression or continuation of "tradition".

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Paulenz, 1999. "Selbstjustiz in Benin. Zur Debatte über den Charakter außerstaatlicher Sanktionsformen in Afrika," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 34(1), pages 59-83.
  • Handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:34:y:1999:i:1:p:59-83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:34:y:1999:i:1:p:59-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andreas Mehler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.