IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v6y2013i12p6586-6607d31473.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three-Phase Primary Control for Unbalance Sharing between Distributed Generation Units in a Microgrid

Author

Listed:
  • Tine L. Vandoorn

    (Department of Electrical Energy, Systems & Automation, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium)

  • Jeroen D. M. De Kooning

    (Department of Electrical Energy, Systems & Automation, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium)

  • Jan Van de Vyver

    (Department of Electrical Energy, Systems & Automation, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium)

  • Lieven Vandevelde

    (Department of Electrical Energy, Systems & Automation, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium)

Abstract

For islanded microgrids, droop-based control concepts have been developed both in single and three-phase variants. The three-phase controllers often assume a balanced network; hence, unbalance sharing and/or mitigation remains a challenging issue. Therefore, in this paper, unbalance is considered in a three-phase islanded microgrid in which the distributed generation (DG) units are operated by the voltage-based droop (VBD) control. For this purpose, the VBD control, which has been developed for single-phase systems, is extended for a three-phase application and an additional control loop is added for unbalance mitigation and sharing. The method is based on an unbalance mitigation scheme by DG units in grid-connected systems, which is altered for usage in grid-forming DG units with droop control. The reaction of the DG units to unbalance is determined by the main parameter of the additional control loop, viz., the distortion damping resistance, R d . The effect of R d on the unbalance mitigation is studied in this paper, i.e., dependent on Rd , the DG units can be resistive for unbalance (RU) or they can contribute in the weakest phase (CW). The paper shows that the RU method decreases the line losses in the system and achieves better power equalization between the DG unit’s phases. However, it leads to a larger voltage unbalance near the loads. The CW method leads to a more uneven power between the DG unit’s phases and larger line losses, but a better voltage quality near the load. However, it can negatively affect the stability of the system. In microgrids with multiple DG units, the distortion damping resistance is set such that the unbalanced load can be shared between multiple DG units in an actively controlled manner rather than being determined by the microgrid configuration solely. The unit with the lowest distortion damping resistance provides relatively more of the unbalanced currents.

Suggested Citation

  • Tine L. Vandoorn & Jeroen D. M. De Kooning & Jan Van de Vyver & Lieven Vandevelde, 2013. "Three-Phase Primary Control for Unbalance Sharing between Distributed Generation Units in a Microgrid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:6:y:2013:i:12:p:6586-6607:d:31473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/6/12/6586/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/6/12/6586/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haritza Camblong & Aitor Etxeberria & Juanjo Ugartemendia & Octavian Curea, 2014. "Gain Scheduling Control of an Islanded Microgrid Voltage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Demin Li & Bo Zhao & Zaijun Wu & Xuesong Zhang & Leiqi Zhang, 2017. "An Improved Droop Control Strategy for Low-Voltage Microgrids Based on Distributed Secondary Power Optimization Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:6:y:2013:i:12:p:6586-6607:d:31473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.