Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Effect of Different Feed Structures and Bedding on the Horizontal Spread of Campylobacter jejuni within Broiler Flocks

Contents:

Author Info

  • Beate Skånseng

    ()
    (Nofima, Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, 1430 Ås, Norway)

  • Birger Svihus

    ()
    (Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432 Ås, Norway)

  • Knut Rudi

    ()
    (Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432 Ås, Norway)

  • Pål Trosvik

    ()
    (Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway)

  • Birgitte Moen

    ()
    (Nofima, Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, 1430 Ås, Norway)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    In this study, we investigated the effects of different feed structures and beddings on the spread of C. jejuni in broiler flocks, and the effect on the cecal microbiota. Broiler chickens raised in 24 eight-bird group cages on either rubber mat or wood shavings were fed either a wheat-based control diet (Control), a diet where 50% of the ground wheat was replaced by whole wheat prior to pelleting (Wheat), or a wheat-based diet, such as the control diet diluted with 12% oat hulls (Oat). Samples from the cloacal mucosa of all birds were taken daily for C. jejuni quantification and cecum samples were collected at the end of the experiment for C. jejuni quantification and microbiota analyses. We have shown a statistically significant effect of increased feed structure on the reduced spread of C. jejuni in chicken flocks, but no significant differences were detected between types of structure included in the feed. No significant changes in the dominating microbiota in the lower lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract were observed, which indicates that feed structure only has an effect on the upper GI tract. Delaying the spread of C. jejuni in broiler flocks could, at time of slaughter, result in fewer C. jejuni -positive broilers.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/3/4/741/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/3/4/741/
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by MDPI, Open Access Journal in its journal Agriculture.

    Volume (Year): 3 (2013)
    Issue (Month): 4 (October)
    Pages: 741-760

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:3:y:2013:i:4:p:741-760:d:30040

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.mdpi.com/

    Related research

    Keywords: Campylobacter jejuni ; poultry; whole wheat; oat hulls; litter; microbiota;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Anonymous, 2005. "Trends in Australian Agriculture," Commission Research Papers 31903, Productivity Commission.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:3:y:2013:i:4:p:741-760:d:30040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (XML Conversion Team).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.