U.S. regional trade with Canada during the transition to free trade
AbstractThis article examines the U.S. and Canadian responses to the early years of the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement from a U.S. regional perspective. It draws on a highly detailed data base from Statistics Canada. Although the article discusses which regions enjoyed the fastest growth in trade with Canada over this period, and why, the major focus of the study is the impact of increased integration on the nature of trade and investment flows between the two countries. The author explores, for example, whether trade has expanded on the basis of comparative resource endowments or has taken the form of increased intra-industry trade, two-way trade in similar products, which largely reflects economies of large-scale production and specialization.> The author finds that, to date, U.S. and Canadian firms are emphasizing trade rather than direct investment as a means of serving the integrating market. However, the results concerning the foundations for this trade expansion are mixed. At the national level, trade has grown on the basis of comparative advantage, and the share of two-way trade is little changed. However, national data conceal a variety of regional experiences: The share of two-way trade has grown in over half the regions, and changes in the industrial composition of trade are greater within regions than the national data would suggest. Contrary to conventional wisdom, moreover, structural change was greatest where two-way trade grew most. Thus, the author ends by suggesting that the nature of the intra-firm--rather than the intra-industry--response may be the key to determining how smoothly economies adjust to increased integration.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Federal Reserve Bank of Boston in its journal New England Economic Review.
Volume (Year): (1996)
Issue (Month): Jan ()
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Catherine Spozio).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.