IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fec/journl/v10y2015i3p483-508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Did Civilian Granaries Affect Social Stability? Empirical Evidence from the Qing Dynasty (1817¨C1856)

Author

Listed:
  • Fang Wang

    (School of Economics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Degang Miao

    (School of Economics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Xiaobo He

    (School of International Economics and Trade, Shanghai Finance University, Shanghai 201209, China; Global Food Studies, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia)

Abstract

Based on historical panel data of social instability, civilian granary and climate shocks in the 17 Provinces of the Qing from 1817 to 1856, this paper examines the correlation between social instability and civilian granary holdings. It shows that the civilian granary system reduced social instability in the Qing Dynasty, while climate shocks raised social instability. Moreover, this paper shows that civilian granaries mitigated the effects of climate shocks on social instability.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang Wang & Degang Miao & Xiaobo He, 2015. "Did Civilian Granaries Affect Social Stability? Empirical Evidence from the Qing Dynasty (1817¨C1856)," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 10(3), pages 483-508, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:fec:journl:v:10:y:2015:i:3:p:483-508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journal.hep.com.cn/fec/EN/10.3868/s060-004-015-0021-5
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    climate shocks; civilian granaries; social instability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • N55 - Economic History - - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment and Extractive Industries - - - Asia including Middle East
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fec:journl:v:10:y:2015:i:3:p:483-508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Frank H. Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.