Forward Premiums in the Brussels SE and the Shadow Price of Cash Balances
AbstractInvestors who want to profitably trade stocks which they believe to be undervalued or overvalued are facing not just transaction costs: also cash constraints and short-selling restriction can hinder them. Intuitively, the more onerous friction may seem to be short-selling: borrowing shares from someone else and selling them looks more of a hassle than borrowing money or using an overdraft facility. By examining the observed forward premiums in the Brussels Stock Exchange during the period 1989-1996, this study aims at uncovering which of the two types of restrictions had the biggest impact on trading: how often was shortselling the dominant problem, what was the implied shadow cost of the imperfection, and how persistent were the symptoms? We first test whether forward premiums are fully explained by the settlement effect, we find that the time value signal is significant in forward premiums, but the effect is below our theoretical priors. Next, we show theoretically that a positive forward premium is more likely in a situation in which the order volume from cash-constrained buyers exceeds that of sellers without a long position. Likewise, a negative forward premium typically means that the order volume from sellers without long positions exceeds that of cash-constrained buyers. We find that abnormally high forward premiums are 2.5-3 times more frequent and larger than negative premiums, and that they persist in time, unlike negative premiums. Thus, contrary to what many academics may have expected, getting money loans seems to be a more frequent, more expensive, and more persistent problem than asset borrowing.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfswetenschappen in its journal Review of Business and Economics.
Volume (Year): LIV (2009)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
dual markets; settlement effect; market microstructure;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
- G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Hilde Roos) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Hilde Roos to update the entry or send us the correct address.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.