IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/erp/eiopxx/p0202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The CSDP Mission Planning Process of the European Union: Innovations and Shortfalls

Author

Listed:
  • Mattelaer, Alexander

Abstract

This paper analyses and evaluates the CSDP mission planning process, i.e. the procedural model for planning, launching and reviewing CSDP operations. It shows that the EU has developed an intricate planning mechanism by generously drawing upon existing NATO planning doctrine while adding a distinct European touch. These innovations amount to expanding military planning models to civilian operations, tightening political oversight and fostering close links and cooperative mechanisms with the UN peacekeeping system. As such, the innovations mostly pertain to the political aspects of mission planning. However, some problems persist at the strategic and operational levels of mission planning, such as institutional arrangements for planning and commanding operations, procedures pertaining to force generation and inter-pillar coordination, and operational planning doctrine. Lessons learned from recent operational experiences indicate that the mental gap between the political and operational level is in need of remediation. This can be done either by keeping political expectations realistic or by investing more political will and effort in understanding and resolving operational difficulties.

Suggested Citation

  • Mattelaer, Alexander, 2010. "The CSDP Mission Planning Process of the European Union: Innovations and Shortfalls," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2010-009a.htm
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2010-009.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Norheim-Martinsen, Per Martin, 2010. "Managing the Civil-Military Interface in the EU: Creating an Organisation Fit for Purpose," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanhoonacker, Sophie & Dijkstra, Hylke & Maurer Heidi, 2010. "Understanding the Role of Bureaucracy in the European Security and Defence Policy: The State of the Art," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.
    2. Mérand, Frédéric & Hofmann, Stephanie & Irondelle, Bastien, 2010. "Transgovernmental Networks in the European Security and Defense Policy," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Assistant (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.