IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/erp/eiopxx/p0199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EU’s Security Sector Reform Policies in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Author

Listed:
  • Justaert, Arnout
  • Keukeleire, Stephan

Abstract

In this article we approach the functioning of bureaucracy in ESDP from a governance perspective that also focuses on informal patterns of interaction between the relevant bureaucratic actors. Following the governance and related network governance approaches, the interplay between formal and informal patterns of interaction can help to overcome deadlock in policy-making and to procure effective problem-solving. This perspective is applied to security sector reform (SSR) in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). SSR is one of the major emerging fields of activity within the civilian crisis management dimension of ESDP, that also in the DRC became a focal point in the EU’s new security and defence policy since its inception. However, as the EU involvement in the Congolese security sector reform policies illustrates, coordination and negotiation among European actors to overcome deadlock and produce effective problem-solving is not self-evident or even desirable for all actors. In the case of the EU’s SSR policies in Congo, coordination indeed occurs between the actors that are dependent upon each other in terms of resources and have the willingness to jointly tackle the problems related to the SSR in the DRC. However, it is also often undermined by actors that prefer to engage bilaterally because they possess the resources to do so and the personal relationships with the Congolese authorities to act more efficiently and effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Justaert, Arnout & Keukeleire, Stephan, 2010. "The EU’s Security Sector Reform Policies in the Democratic Republic of Congo," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2010-006a.htm
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2010-006.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beate Kohler-Koch & Berthold Rittberger, 2006. "Review Article: The 'Governance Turn' in EU Studies," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44, pages 27-49, September.
    2. Wright, Vincent, 2001. "The National Co-ordination of EU Policy: The European Level," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199248056 edited by Kassim, Hussein & Menon, Anand & Peters, B. Guy, Decembrie.
    3. Vanhoonacker, Sophie & Dijkstra, Hylke & Maurer Heidi, 2010. "Understanding the Role of Bureaucracy in the European Security and Defence Policy: The State of the Art," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stie, Anne Elizabeth, 2010. "Decision-making Void of Democratic Qualities? An Evaluation of the EU’s Second Pillar Decision-making Procedure," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.
    2. Elena A. KOROSTELEVA, 2013. "Evaluating the role of partnership in the European Neighbourhood Policy: the Eastern neighbourhood," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 4, pages 11-36, December.
    3. Raphael Bossong, 2008. "The Action Plan on Combating Terrorism: A Flawed Instrument of EU Security Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46, pages 27-48, January.
    4. Vanhoonacker, Sophie & Dijkstra, Hylke & Maurer Heidi, 2010. "Understanding the Role of Bureaucracy in the European Security and Defence Policy: The State of the Art," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.
    5. Štěpánka Zemanová & Radka Druláková, 2012. "Europeanization after Lisbon: Competencies, Governance and Domestic Changes in the Context of the new EU Primary Legislation [Evropeizace po Lisabonu: Kompetence, governance a domácí změny v kontex," Současná Evropa, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(2), pages 65-82.
    6. Flynn Brendan, 2016. "The EU’s Maritime Security Strategy: a Neo-Medieval Perspective on the Limits of Soft Security?," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 22(75), pages 9-37, August.
    7. Mérand, Frédéric & Hofmann, Stephanie & Irondelle, Bastien, 2010. "Transgovernmental Networks in the European Security and Defense Policy," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.
    8. Yirga Ayele, Bosena & Megento, Tebarek Lika & Habetemariam, Kumelachew Yeshitela, 2021. "‘‘Governance of green infrastructure planning in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia’’," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    9. Andreas Faludi, 2013. "Territorial Cohesion, Territorialism, Territoriality, and Soft Planning: A Critical Review," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(6), pages 1302-1317, June.
    10. Frédéric Mérand & Stéphanie C. Hofmann & Bastien Irondelle, 2011. "Governance and State Power: A Network Analysis of European Security," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 121-147, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Assistant (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.