'The End of the Beginning' of Eastern Enlargement � Luxembourg Summit and Agenda-setting
AbstractThe core argument of this article is that pre-negotiation matters. Policy problems are not just �out there�, but socially constructed. In order to comprehend the outcome of any negotiation it is therefore not sufficient just to look at the �give and take� at the actual bargaining table, but also at the �negotiation to negotiate�. Furthermore, the article argues that pre-negotiation carves out a role for agenda-setting, seeing that governments often enter this phase with un-fixed preferences. These central points of the article are summed up in a theoretical framework, which stands out as a critique of liberal intergovernmentalism. On the basis of this framework the article sets out to analyse the pre-negotiation phase of eastern enlargement, the Luxembourg Summit. Its key conclusion is that the majority of the governments entered this �game� searching for their preferences and that this enabled both the Commission and two smaller states to influence the outcome by setting the agenda in a specific way.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A) in its journal European Integration online Papers (EIoP).
Volume (Year): 2 (1998)
Issue (Month): (October)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Editorial Assistant).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.