An insurance paradox
AbstractPurpose – To consider why the law of large numbers does not play a more significant role in determining an insurer's financial leverage. Design/methodology/approach – Insurer-group data show that there is little relationship between an insurer's premium volume and its overall leverage (i.e. net written premium-to-surplus ratio). An explanation is sought for the lack of a positive scale effect by considering concomitant negative scale effects. Findings – It is argued that insurers frequently convert the benefits of the law of large numbers into economic subsidies for expanded writings that include poorer risks. Originality/value – The editorial identifies and explores a significant scale phenomenon in the insurance sector that is generally overlooked.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Emerald Group Publishing in its journal Journal of Risk Finance.
Volume (Year): 7 (2006)
Issue (Month): 2 (March)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.emeraldinsight.com
Postal: Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, BD16 1WA, UK
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Louise Lister).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.