Purpose – The article's aim is to report and comment on the High Court case Spreadex Ltd v. Sekhon. Design/methodology/approach – The article outlines the facts surrounding the case and comments on the ruling. Findings – The High Court rules that a customer who opted from private to intermediate customer status was contributorily negligent to his spread betting losses. Originality/value – The article shows that there are many points in this decision where either what was revealed by the evidence or the Judge's comments and reasoning will echo beyond the parameters of the case itself.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 4 (2008) Issue (Month): 4 (November) Pages: 414-420 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF