Reconsiders Umberto Ricci’s harsh comments on the book of the young Attilio da Empoli about the Theory of Economic Equilibrium and also re-examines da Empoli’s original theses about “ultramarginality” that aroused Umberto Ricci’s fierce criticism. In his reply, da Empoli punctually rebutted those comments, but Ricci did not answer back, probably in order not to lend himself to act as a resonance chamber. In fact, da Empoli’s approach, which led to doubt being cast on the competitive equilibria of Marshallian memory, seconded the criticism brought forward at that time against dominant orthodoxy. And Ricci really was an economist who acted inside orthodoxy and claimed to keep on doing so.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 28 (2001) Issue (Month): 4/5 (September) Pages: 299-305 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF