Supervenience in socio-economic systems
AbstractPurpose – The purpose of this paper is to clarify issues concerning the implications and usefulness of the concept of supervenience in social analysis and research. Design/methodology/approach – Supervenience refers to the notion that interaction in complex systems gives rise to superordinate phenomena, possessing qualities that differ from those of the interacting entities “below”. In order to discuss the application of the concept in sociology, the article draws upon the distinction between “weak” and “strong” supervenience. “Weak” supervenience characterizes the superordinate as being independent of any particular patterning at subordinate levels, while “strong” supervenience refers to the existence of tighter, more knowable, relationships between the super- and sub-ordinate. Findings – The paper finds that analyses of the social have long been preoccupied with supervenient properties. Indeed, sociological disciplines can be usefully characterized and distinguished in terms of whether they assume “weak” or “strong” supervenience in their analysis of human affairs. Research limitations/implications – The research needs further critical investigation of the use of supervenience in current sociological discourse and analysis. Practical implications – Through discussing its already important place in social analysis, the article argues for the refinement and critical application of supervenience in future social studies. Originality/value – The paper reviews and refines issues concerning the importance and implications of supervenience for sociological analysis and social research.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Emerald Group Publishing in its journal Humanomics: The International Journal of Systems and Ethics.
Volume (Year): 25 (2009)
Issue (Month): 3 (July)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.emeraldinsight.com
Postal: Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, BD16 1WA, UK
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Virginia Chapman).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.