This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The Curtailment of Critical Commentary in Australian Economics

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Brian Dollery (University of New England)
Joel Byrnes (KPMG)
Galia Akimova (University of New England)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Coelho, De Worken-Eley and McClure (2005) showed that, 1963 through 2004, critical commentary declined significantly in the American Economic Review, Economic Journal, Journal of Political Economy, Quarterly Journal of Economics and the Review of Economics and Statistics. Using the same method, we investigated the same question for all of the economic journals produced in Australia, and then published the results in Australian Economic Papers (Dollery, Byrnes and Akimova 2007). We found the same trend in Australia for the period 1962 to 2005. This suggests that the downward trend may apply across economics journals generally. This short note simply relates the basic finding of our Australian Economic Papers article.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.econjournalwatch.org/pdf/DolleryetalFollowUpSeptember2008.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Article provided by Atlas Economic Research Foundation in its journal Econ Journal Watch.

Volume (Year): 5 (2008)
Issue (Month): 3 (September)
Pages: 349-351
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:ejw:volone:2008349-351

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.econjournalwatch.org/main/index.php

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Kevin Rollins).

Related research
Keywords: critical commentary; economics journals;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
A10 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - General
A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
B40 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - General

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Philip R.P. Coelho and James E. McClure, 2006. "Why Has Critical Commentary Been Curtailed at Top Economics Journals? A Reply to Robert Whaples," Econ Journal Watch, Atlas Economic Research Foundation, vol. 3(2), pages 283-291, May. [Downloadable!]
  2. Philip R. P. Coelho & James E. McClure, 2005. "Theory versus Application: Does Complexity Crowd Out Evidence?," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, vol. 71(3), pages 556-565, January.
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? About 2700 working paper series are listed on RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-20.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.