This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Why Has Critical Commentary Been Curtailed at Top Economics Journals? A Reply to Robert Whaples

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Philip R.P. Coelho and James E. McClure ()

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.econjournalwatch.org/pdf/CoelhoMcClureEconomicsInPracticeMay2006.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Article provided by Atlas Economic Research Foundation in its journal Econ Journal Watch.

Volume (Year): 3 (2006)
Issue (Month): 2 (May)
Pages: 283-291
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:ejw:volone:2006283-291

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.econjournalwatch.org/main/index.php

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Kevin Rollins).

Related research
Keywords: Critical commentary; scientific inquiry; debate; editorial policy; prejudice; error; reliability; animosity; vanity;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
A10 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - General
A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
B40 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - General

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Ziliak, Stephen T. & McCloskey, Deirdre N., 2004. "Size matters: the standard error of regressions in the American Economic Review," The Journal of Socio-Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 527-546, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  2. David N. Laband & Robert D. Tollison, 2003. "Dry Holes in Economic Research," Kyklos, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 56(2), pages 161-173, 05. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Robert Whaples, 2006. "The Costs of Critical Commentary in Economics Journals," Econ Journal Watch, Atlas Economic Research Foundation, vol. 3(2), pages 275-282, May. [Downloadable!]
  4. Thomas Mayer, 2004. "Dry Holes in Economic Research: Comment," Kyklos, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 57(4), pages 621-626, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Michael Bräuninger & Justus Haucap, 2003. "Reputation and Relevance of Economics Journals," Kyklos, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 56(2), pages 175-197, 05. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Brian Dollery & Joel Byrnes & Galia Akimova, 2008. "The Curtailment of Critical Commentary in Australian Economics," Econ Journal Watch, Atlas Economic Research Foundation, vol. 5(3), pages 349-351, September. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Data contributors to RePEc receive monthly emails with details about downloads and abstract views of their works.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-20.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.