Over the past four decades, top economics journals have virtually eliminated critical commentary (comments, replies, rejoinders, and the like). This article shows the data and discusses these steep declines in critical commentary. To the extent that critical commentary is beneficial to scientific inquiry, editorial opposition to critical commentary is detrimental to the advancement of economic knowledge.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Article provided by Atlas Economic Research Foundation in its journal Econ Journal Watch.
Volume (Year): 2 (2005) Issue (Month): 2 (August) Pages: 355-361 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Find related papers by JEL classification: A10 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - General A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists B40 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - General
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Laband, David N & Tollison, Robert D & Karahan, Gokhan R, 2002.
"Quality Control in Economics,"
Kyklos,
Blackwell Publishing, vol. 55(3), pages 315-34.
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)