Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Two Cheers for the Bundle-of-Sticks Metaphor, Three Cheers for Merrill and Smith

Contents:

Author Info

  • Robert C. Ellickson
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Viewing property rights as a "bundle of sticks" can be descriptively clarifying because the law commonly entitles an owner of a particular resource to split up entitlements in it. Nonetheless, Thomas Merrill and Henry Smith, the most prominent critics of the metaphor, assert that this conception both ignores the existence of various legal constraints on the decomposition of property rights, and also encourages lawmakers to support the excessive splintering of entitlements. These concerns are well-grounded. More controversial are Merrill and Smith's inclinations to equate private property with property generally, to deny that human capital can be characterized as property, and to assert that affirmative duties never attach to property ownership.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://econjwatch.org/file_download/500/EllicksonSept2011.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://econjwatch.org/751
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Econ Journal Watch in its journal Econ Journal Watch.

    Volume (Year): 8 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 3 (September)
    Pages: 215-222

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:8:y:2011:i:3:p:215-222

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: MSN 3G4, Fairfax, VA 22030
    Phone: (703) 993-1151
    Fax: 703.993.1133
    Web page: http://econjwatch.org/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Property; bundle of rights; exclusion; legal realism; law and economics;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:8:y:2011:i:3:p:215-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jason Briggeman) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Jason Briggeman to update the entry or send us the correct address.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.