IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejw/journl/v1y2004i2p272-273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response to Klein

Author

Listed:
  • Cass R. Sunstein

Abstract

LIBERTARIAN PATERNALISTS INSIST ON FREEDOM OF CHOICE; they do not want to foreclose options (Sunstein and Thaler 2003). At the same time, they believe that, in many contexts, planners cannot help influencing choosers, even if they aspire to neutrality. If influences are inevitable, shouldn't planning be undertaken with some awareness of its effects? Libertarian paternalists believe that the answer is clearly yes—and that planners in the private and public sectors should explore approaches that lead people toward welfare-increasing outcomes while also leaving them free to choose.

Suggested Citation

  • Cass R. Sunstein, 2004. "Response to Klein," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 1(2), pages 272-273, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:1:y:2004:i:2:p:272-273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/File+download/53/2004-08-sunstein-com.pdf?mimetype=pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/175
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel B. Klein, 2004. "Reply to Sunstein," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 1(2), pages 274-276, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:1:y:2004:i:2:p:272-273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jason Briggeman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edgmuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.