Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

The Max U Approach: Prudence Only, or Not Even Prudence? A Smithian Perspective


Author Info

  • David Lipka
Registered author(s):


    In many works Deirdre McCloskey criticizes professional economics for too readily representing man as a maximizing agent—Mr. Maximum Utility, or Max U. McCloskey says that economic activities are not the machinations of robots or mathematical functions, but rather affairs among human beings. She prefers to approach the human being as a complex of virtues (or lack thereof). In all this, I basically concur. But McCloskey says that the Max U approach represents man in terms of one virtue: prudence. She calls the Max U approach “Prudence Only.” My concern is that associating Max U with prudence does not do justice to prudence. In treating of prudence, I draw exclusively from Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments. Smith makes many statements about prudence. It is by no means clear that they add up to a well defined notion of prudence, but it is clear that most of Smith’s important statements about prudence do not fit the Max U approach. My paper aims to correct and avoid any notion that Smithian prudence may be thought of as maximization or optimization.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Econ Journal Watch in its journal Econ Journal Watch.

    Volume (Year): 10 (2013)
    Issue (Month): 1 (January)
    Pages: 2-14

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:10:y:2013:i:1:p:2-14

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: MSN 3G4, Fairfax, VA 22030
    Phone: (703) 993-1151
    Fax: 703.993.1133
    Web page:
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Max U; prudence; Moral Sentiments; Adam Smith; D. N. McCloskey;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:


    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Klein, Daniel, 2012. "Knowledge and Coordination: A Liberal Interpretation," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, number 9780199794126, October.
    2. Sugden, Robert, 1991. "Rational Choice: A Survey of Contributions from Economics and Philosophy," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, Royal Economic Society, vol. 101(407), pages 751-85, July.
    3. Edward P. Lazear, 2000. "Economic Imperialism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 115(1), pages 99-146, February.
    4. George J. Stigler, 1971. "Smith's Travels on the Ship of State," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, Duke University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 265-277, Fall.
    5. Searle, John R., 2005. "What is an institution?," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(01), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Deirdre Mccloskey, 2008. "Not by P Alone: A Virtuous Economy," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 181-197.
    7. Raphael, D. D., 2009. "The Impartial Spectator: Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, number 9780199568260, October.
    8. Deirdre McCloskey, 2008. "Adam Smith, the Last of the Former Virtue Ethicists," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, Duke University Press, vol. 40(1), pages 43-71, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as in new window

    Cited by:
    1. David Lipka, 2014. "Do economists need virtues?," ICER Working Papers, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research 06-2014, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.


    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


    Access and download statistics


    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:10:y:2013:i:1:p:2-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jason Briggeman) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Jason Briggeman to update the entry or send us the correct address.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.