IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eis/articl/105fan.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Welfare Effect of an Equivalent Tariff and Quota

Author

Listed:
  • L-S Fan
  • C-M Fan

Abstract

Over many years, the comparison of tariffs and quotas has retained an important place in the study of trade restrictions. This note shows that there are substantial differences in the welfare effects of an equivalent tariff and quota designed to achieve identical import restrictions. When there is an increase in demand, the deadweight loss from an import quota will be greater than that of a tariff. Geometric presentations are executed by way of comparative static analyses for a small open economy. Moreover, measurements of welfare effects in terms of the demand elasticity and the supply elasticity are explicitly derived algebraically. A case involving monopoly is also explored to highlight the relative merit of a tariff as a means of import restriction.

Suggested Citation

  • L-S Fan & C-M Fan, 2005. "On the Welfare Effect of an Equivalent Tariff and Quota," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eis:articl:105fan
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.economicissues.org.uk/Files/105Fan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tamara Todorova & Georgi Kalchev, 2015. "The Protective Effect of an Import Quota," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 50(2), pages 85-98, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eis:articl:105fan. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan Wheatley (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bsntuuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.