IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/worpat/v26y2004i3p235-238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inventors' productivity in a publicly funded R&D agency--the case of CSIR in India

Author

Listed:
  • Gupta, V. K.

Abstract

Intellectual property rights have become a significant component of R&D policy in India. The inventor's productivity is a major concern of the publicly funded R&D organizations like the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). The paper examines the patenting activity of inventors from CSIR in India and the US during 1976-2000. It observes that there is no uniform trend in patent output of inventors. The patent productivity is highly concentrated in a relatively small number of talented individuals. The first inventors have a role as scientific mentors. It defines the 'pioneer first inventors' as those who contribute more as first inventor and less as co-inventor. The 'patronising first inventors' are those who contribute less as first inventor but more as co-inventor. Though the former produce more patents in total in comparison to the latter yet the per inventor output of 'patronising first inventors' is twice that of 'pioneer first inventors'. The paper suggests that, within CSIR's policy of rewarding innovation and creativity, the role of leading inventors should be distinguished as pioneering first inventors and patronising first inventors and their contributions rewarded accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Gupta, V. K., 2004. "Inventors' productivity in a publicly funded R&D agency--the case of CSIR in India," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 235-238, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:26:y:2004:i:3:p:235-238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172-2190(04)00028-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:26:y:2004:i:3:p:235-238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/654/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.