IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v18y2011i2p480-488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The development of a benchmarking tool for monitoring progress towards sustainable transportation in New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Henning, Theunis F.P.
  • Muruvan, Sugandree
  • Feng, Wanhua A.
  • Dunn, Roger C.

Abstract

Creating and maintaining a safe and sustainable transport system is a common challenge for road authorities around the world. The New Zealand government has taken this challenge one step further by incorporating it into country's legislation. As a consequence all road land transport authorities are committed to implementing initiatives to respond to both the challenge and the legislation. A benchmarking process for the transport sector is one of these initiatives on a national level. Benchmarking is a well known and utilised technology for the measuring of performance for infrastructure, for example within the water provision sector in England. This paper presents the development of a national benchmarking process for the transport sector of New Zealand. This development is part of a strategy to encourage road land transport authorities to improve the performance of transport in achieving sustainability and environmental targets. The development involved a literature review, proof of concept and the full implementation stage. A total of nine key performance indicators were developed to indicate the status of transport sector performance. The project and its outcomes are considered to be of benefit to road land transport authorities across the world who wish to develop a benchmark process of their own.

Suggested Citation

  • Henning, Theunis F.P. & Muruvan, Sugandree & Feng, Wanhua A. & Dunn, Roger C., 2011. "The development of a benchmarking tool for monitoring progress towards sustainable transportation in New Zealand," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 480-488, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:18:y:2011:i:2:p:480-488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967-070X(10)00136-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hensher, David A. & Stanley, John, 2003. "Performance-based quality contracts in bus service provision," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 519-538, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Volker Frehe & Frank Teuteberg, 2017. "Information and communication technology in green logistics: status quo and research gaps," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 65-96, April.
    2. Qi Wang & Tobias Jeppsson, 2022. "Identifying benchmark units for research management and evaluation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7557-7574, December.
    3. Smith, T.W. & Axon, C.J. & Darton, R.C., 2013. "A methodology for measuring the sustainability of car transport systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 308-317.
    4. Salvatore Amoroso & Guiseppe Salvo & Petro Zito, 2011. "Sustainable Urban Public Transport: A Comparison between European and North African Cities," MIC 2011: Managing Sustainability? Proceedings of the 12th International Conference, Portorož, 23–26 November 2011 [Selected Papers],, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper.
    5. Theuns Henning & Mohammed Dalil Essakali & Jung Eun Oh, 2011. "A Framework for Urban Transport Benchmarking," World Bank Publications - Reports 12847, The World Bank Group.
    6. Kumar, Harish & Singh, Manoj Kumar & Gupta, M.P., 2019. "A policy framework for city eligibility analysis: TISM and fuzzy MICMAC-weighted approach to select a city for smart city transformation in India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 375-390.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nayan, Ashish & Wang, David Z.W., 2017. "Optimal bus transit route packaging in a privatized contracting regime," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 146-157.
    2. Epstein, Bryan & Givoni, Moshe, 2016. "Analyzing the gap between the QOS demanded by PT users and QOS supplied by service operators," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 622-637.
    3. dell'Olio, Luigi & Ibeas, Angel & Cecin, Patricia, 2011. "The quality of service desired by public transport users," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 217-227, January.
    4. Stanley, John & Hensher, David A., 2008. "Delivering trusting partnerships for route bus services: A Melbourne case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 1295-1301, December.
    5. John Stanley & David A. Hensher, 2004. "Melbourne's Public Transport Franchising: Lessons for PPPs," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 14(33), pages 42-50, July.
    6. Astrid Cullman & Mehdi Farsi & Massimo Filippini, 2009. "Unobserved Heterogeneity and International Benchmarking in Public Transport," CEPE Working paper series 09-65, CEPE Center for Energy Policy and Economics, ETH Zurich.
    7. Pyddoke, Roger & Lindgren, Hanna, 2018. "Outcomes from new contracts with “strong” incentives for increasing ridership in bus transport in Stockholm," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 197-206.
    8. Tiznado, Ignacio & Galilea, Patricia & Delgado, Felipe & Niehaus, Markus, 2014. "Incentive schemes for bus drivers: The case of the public transit system in Santiago, Chile," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 77-83.
    9. Ho, Chinh & Mulley, Corinne, 2014. "Metrobuses in Sydney: How high capacity and high frequency services are benefiting the Metropolitan fringe," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 339-348.
    10. João M. Pinto & Mário Coutinho dos Santos & Pedro Verga Matos, 2021. "Contracting Out Public Transit Services: An Incentive Performance-Based Approach," Working Papers de Economia (Economics Working Papers) 02, Católica Porto Business School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
    11. Chaparro, Alejandra & Galilea, Patricia & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Poblete, Joaquín, 2020. "Application of an incentive for bus drivers to achieve an improvement in the quality of service," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    12. Ling, Shuai & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng & Lan, Yanfei & Hu, Wandi, 2019. "An incentive mechanism design for bus subsidy based on the route service level," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 271-283.
    13. Feifei Qin & Xiaoning Zhang, 2015. "Designing an Optimal Subsidy Scheme to Reduce Emissions for a Competitive Urban Transport Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Feng, Zhuo & Zhang, Shui-Bo & Gao, Ying & Zhang, Shuai-Jun, 2016. "Subsidizing and pricing private toll roads with noncontractible service quality: A relational contract approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 466-491.
    15. Emerson, David & Mulley, Corinne & Bliemer, Michiel C.J., 2016. "A theoretical analysis of business models for urban public transport systems, with comparative reference to a Community Franchise involving Individual Line Ownership," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 368-378.
    16. Agostino, Deborah & Steenhuisen, Bauke & Arnaboldi, Michela & de Bruijn, Hans, 2014. "PMS development in local public transport: Comparing Milan and Amsterdam," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 26-32.
    17. Sepúlveda, Juan Pablo & Galilea, Patricia, 2020. "How do different payment schemes to operators affect public transport concessions? A microeconomic model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 27-35.
    18. Benedetto Barabino & Nicola Aldo Cabras & Claudio Conversano & Alessandro Olivo, 2020. "An Integrated Approach to Select Key Quality Indicators in Transit Services," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 1045-1080, June.
    19. Jonathan Nelson Malcolm Cowie, 2011. "Contestability in bus markets - evidence from the British deregulated market," Post-Print hal-00730232, HAL.
    20. Pedro, Marisa J.G. & Macário, Rosário, 2016. "A review of general practice in contracting public transport services and transfer to BRT systems," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 94-106.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:18:y:2011:i:2:p:480-488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.