IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v40y2004i2p123-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adjusting the Herfindahl index for close substitutes: an application to pricing in civil aviation

Author

Listed:
  • Lijesen, Mark G.

Abstract

The Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI) is a well known concentration measure, which is both widely used and widely criticized. The main shortcoming of the HHI is its sensitivity for the relevant market definition, in terms of both geographical boundaries and in terms of product homogeneity. In this paper we develop an adjusted version of the HHI that accounts for close substitutes. We test the adjusted HHI empirically for civil aviation, using airfare data. Our results suggest that the adjusted index generates better results than the traditional indicator.

Suggested Citation

  • Lijesen, Mark G., 2004. "Adjusting the Herfindahl index for close substitutes: an application to pricing in civil aviation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 123-134, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:40:y:2004:i:2:p:123-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554503000450
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. T.V.S. Ramamohan Rao, 2012. "Firm Specific Monopoly Power in Differentiated Oligopoly," Journal of Quantitative Economics, The Indian Econometric Society, vol. 10(1), pages 85-97, January.
    2. Ramnath K. Chellappa & V. Sambamurthy & Nilesh Saraf, 2010. "Competing in Crowded Markets: Multimarket Contact and the Nature of Competition in the Enterprise Systems Software Industry," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 614-630, September.
    3. Alexander M. Goulielmos & Giannis Sitzimis, 2012. "Measuring Market Concentration in the Aegean Ferry System," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 62(1-2), pages 7-27, January -.
    4. Zhang, Qiong & Yang, Hangjun & Wang, Qiang & Zhang, Anming & Zhang, Yahua, 2020. "Impact of high-speed rail on market concentration and Lerner index in China's airline market," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. Lieshout, Rogier & Malighetti, Paolo & Redondi, Renato & Burghouwt, Guillaume, 2016. "The competitive landscape of air transport in Europe," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 68-82.
    6. Bian, Junsong & Li, Kevin W. & Guo, Xiaolei, 2016. "A strategic analysis of incorporating CSR into managerial incentive design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 83-93.
    7. Feng, Hongxiang & Grifoll, Manel & Yang, Zhongzhen & Zheng, Pengjun & Martin-Mallofre, Agustí, 2020. "Visualization of container throughput evolution of the Yangtze River Delta multi-port system: the ternary diagram method," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    8. Rau, Philipp & Spinler, Stefan, 2017. "Alliance formation in a cooperative container shipping game: Performance of a real options investment approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 155-175.
    9. Huang, Zhibin & Yong, Jianming & Ma, Wenliang & Chen, Mengying & Xiong, Zihan & Shrestha, Anup, 2022. "Internet penetration and airline pricing: Evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 104-111.
    10. Yusak Susilo & Kay Axhausen, 2014. "Repetitions in individual daily activity–travel–location patterns: a study using the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 995-1011, September.
    11. Koopmans, Carl & Lieshout, Rogier, 2016. "Airline cost changes: To what extent are they passed through to the passenger?," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-11.
    12. Lieshout, Rogier & Matsumoto, Hidenobu, 2012. "New international services and the competitiveness of Tokyo International Airport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 53-64.
    13. Oliveira, Alessandro V.M. & Lohmann, Gui & Costa, Tiago G., 2016. "Network concentration and airport congestion in a post de-regulation context: A case study of Brazil 2000–2010," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 33-44.
    14. Huber, Hans, 2009. "Spatial structure and network behaviour of strategic airline groups: A comparison between Europe and the United States," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 151-162, August.
    15. van den Bogaard, Julien E. & Lijesen, Mark G., 2019. "Pricing of imperfect substitutes: The next flight is not the same flight," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    16. Kordanuli, Bojana & Barjaktarović, Lidija & Jeremić, Ljiljana & Alizamir, Meysam, 2017. "Appraisal of artificial neural network for forecasting of economic parameters," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 515-519.
    17. Lieshout, Rogier, 2012. "Measuring the size of an airport’s catchment area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 27-34.
    18. Ma, Wenliang & Wang, Qiang & Yang, Hangjun & Zhang, Yahua, 2020. "Evaluating the price effects of two airline mergers in China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    19. Huber, Hans, 2009. "Comparing spatial concentration and assessing relative market structure in air traffic," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 184-194.
    20. Jin-Ru Yen & Jing-Cing Chen & Dong-Hua Wang, 2008. "The Change in Structure of Taiwan's Domestic Air Market before and after Deregulation," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 663-679, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:40:y:2004:i:2:p:123-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.