IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v67y2014icp109-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The analysis of vehicle crash injury-severity data: A Markov switching approach with road-segment heterogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • Xiong, Yingge
  • Tobias, Justin L.
  • Mannering, Fred L.

Abstract

Time-constant assumptions in discrete-response heterogeneity models can often be violated. To address this, a time-varying heterogeneity approach to model unobserved heterogeneity in ordered response data is considered. A Markov switching random parameters structure (which accounts for heterogeneity across observations) is proposed to accommodate both time-varying and time-constant (cross-sectional) unobserved heterogeneity in an ordered discrete-response probability model. A data augmented Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm for non-linear model estimation is developed to facilitate model estimation. The performance of the cross-sectional heterogeneity model and time-varying heterogeneity model are examined with vehicle crash-injury severity data. The time-varying heterogeneity model (Markov switching random parameters ordered probit) is found to provide the best overall model fit. Two roadway safety states are shown to exist and roadway segments transition between these two states according to Markov transition probabilities. The results demonstrate considerable promise for Markov switching models in a wide variety of applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiong, Yingge & Tobias, Justin L. & Mannering, Fred L., 2014. "The analysis of vehicle crash injury-severity data: A Markov switching approach with road-segment heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 109-128.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:67:y:2014:i:c:p:109-128
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261514000630
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott, Steven L. & James, Gareth M. & Sugar, Catherine A., 2005. "Hidden Markov Models for Longitudinal Comparisons," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 359-369, June.
    2. Scott H. Holan & Ginger M. Davis & Mark L. Wildhaber & Aaron J. DeLonay & Diana M. Papoulias, 2009. "Hierarchical Bayesian Markov switching models with application to predicting spawning success of shovelnose sturgeon," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(1), pages 47-64, February.
    3. Hamilton, James D, 1989. "A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 357-384, March.
    4. Daniel McFadden & Kenneth Train, 2000. "Mixed MNL models for discrete response," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(5), pages 447-470.
    5. Peter Lenk & Wayne DeSarbo, 2000. "Bayesian inference for finite mixtures of generalized linear models with random effects," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 93-119, March.
    6. Greene, William H. & Hensher, David A., 2003. "A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 681-698, September.
    7. John Geweke & Gianni Amisano, 2011. "Hierarchical Markov normal mixture models with applications to financial asset returns," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 1-29, January/F.
    8. William H. Greene & David A. Hensher, 2013. "Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial logit model," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(14), pages 1897-1902, May.
    9. Hamilton, James D., 1990. "Analysis of time series subject to changes in regime," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-2), pages 39-70.
    10. Nicolas Chopin, 2007. "Inference and model choice for sequentially ordered hidden Markov models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(2), pages 269-284, April.
    11. Dueker, Michael, 1999. "Conditional Heteroscedasticity in Qualitative Response Models of Time Series: A Gibbs-Sampling Approach to the Bank Prime Rate," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 17(4), pages 466-472, October.
    12. Chib, Siddhartha, 1998. "Estimation and comparison of multiple change-point models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 221-241, June.
    13. Chib, Siddhartha, 1996. "Calculating posterior distributions and modal estimates in Markov mixture models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 79-97, November.
    14. Jong Hee Park, 2012. "A Unified Method for Dynamic and Cross‐Sectional Heterogeneity: Introducing Hidden Markov Panel Models," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(4), pages 1040-1054, October.
    15. Angel Bujosa & Antoni Riera & Robert Hicks, 2010. "Combining Discrete and Continuous Representations of Preference Heterogeneity: A Latent Class Approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 47(4), pages 477-493, December.
    16. Kobayashi, Kiyoshi & Kaito, Kiyoyuki & Lethanh, Nam, 2012. "A statistical deterioration forecasting method using hidden Markov model for infrastructure management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 544-561.
    17. Bhat, Chandra, 1999. "An analysis of evening commute stop-making behavior using repeated choice observations from a multi-day survey," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 495-510, September.
    18. Li Mingliang & Tobias Justin L, 2006. "Bayesian Analysis of Structural Effects in an Ordered Equation System," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Clifford Winston & Vikram Maheshri & Fred Mannering, 2006. "An exploration of the offset hypothesis using disaggregate data: The case of airbags and antilock brakes," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 83-99, March.
    20. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    21. Yau, Kelvin K. W. & Lee, Andy H. & Ng, Angus S. K., 2003. "Finite mixture regression model with random effects: application to neonatal hospital length of stay," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-4), pages 359-366, January.
    22. Junyi Shen, 2009. "Latent class model or mixed logit model? A comparison by transport mode choice data," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(22), pages 2915-2924.
    23. James H. Albert & Siddhartha Chib, 2001. "Sequential Ordinal Modeling with Applications to Survival Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 829-836, September.
    24. El Adlouni, Salaheddine & Favre, Anne-Catherine & Bobee, Bernard, 2006. "Comparison of methodologies to assess the convergence of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(10), pages 2685-2701, June.
    25. Xiong, Yingge & Mannering, Fred L., 2013. "The heterogeneous effects of guardian supervision on adolescent driver-injury severities: A finite-mixture random-parameters approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 39-54.
    26. Fruhwirth-Schnatter, Sylvia & Tuchler, Regina & Otter, Thomas, 2004. "Bayesian Analysis of the Heterogeneity Model," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 22(1), pages 2-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Buddhavarapu, Prasad & Bansal, Prateek & Prozzi, Jorge A., 2021. "A new spatial count data model with time-varying parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 566-586.
    2. Fanyu Meng & Pengpeng Xu & Cancan Song & Kun Gao & Zichu Zhou & Lili Yang, 2020. "Influential Factors Associated with Consecutive Crash Severity: A Two-Level Logistic Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Shuai Yu & Yuanhua Jia & Dongye Sun, 2019. "Identifying Factors that Influence the Patterns of Road Crashes Using Association Rules: A case Study from Wisconsin, United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Ping Zhang & Chenzhu Wang & Fei Chen & Suping Cui & Jianchuan Cheng & Wu Bo, 2022. "A Random-Parameter Negative Binomial Model for Assessing Freeway Crash Frequency by Injury Severity: Daytime versus Nighttime," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Yan, Ying & Zhang, Ying & Yang, Xiangli & Hu, Jin & Tang, Jinjun & Guo, Zhongyin, 2020. "Crash prediction based on random effect negative binomial model considering data heterogeneity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 547(C).
    6. Yongji Ma & Jinliang Xu & Chao Gao & Minghao Mu & Guangxun E & Chenwei Gu, 2022. "Review of Research on Road Traffic Operation Risk Prevention and Control," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-26, September.
    7. Younshik Chung & Jong-Jin Kim, 2023. "Exploring Factors Affecting Crash Injury Severity with Consideration of Secondary Collisions in Freeway Tunnels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Behram Wali & Asad Khattak & Thomas Karnowski, 2020. "The relationship between driving volatility in time to collision and crash injury severity in a naturalistic driving environment," Papers 2010.04719, arXiv.org.
    9. Dong, Chunjiao & Shao, Chunfu & Clarke, David B. & Nambisan, Shashi S., 2018. "An innovative approach for traffic crash estimation and prediction on accommodating unobserved heterogeneities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 407-428.
    10. Laura Eboli & Carmen Forciniti, 2020. "The Severity of Traffic Crashes in Italy: An Explorative Analysis among Different Driving Circumstances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Tong Zhu & Zishuo Zhu & Jie Zhang & Chenxuan Yang, 2021. "Electric Bicyclist Injury Severity during Peak Traffic Periods: A Random-Parameters Approach with Heterogeneity in Means and Variances," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Li, Baibing, 2017. "Stochastic modeling for vehicle platoons (I): Dynamic grouping behavior and online platoon recognition," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 364-377.
    13. Wang, Zhengli & Qi, Xin & Jiang, Hai, 2018. "Estimating the spatiotemporal impact of traffic incidents: An integer programming approach consistent with the propagation of shockwaves," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 356-369.
    14. Zhou, Hanchu & Chang, Fangrong, 2022. "The long-memory temporal dependence of traffic crash fatality for different types of road users," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 607(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiong, Yingge & Mannering, Fred L., 2013. "The heterogeneous effects of guardian supervision on adolescent driver-injury severities: A finite-mixture random-parameters approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 39-54.
    2. Sylvia Kaufmann, 2016. "Hidden Markov models in time series, with applications in economics," Working Papers 16.06, Swiss National Bank, Study Center Gerzensee.
    3. Stephane Hess, 2014. "Latent class structures: taste heterogeneity and beyond," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 14, pages 311-330, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Yoo, James & Ready, Richard C., 2014. "Preference heterogeneity for renewable energy technology," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 101-114.
    5. Bauwens, Luc & Rombouts, Jeroen V.K., 2012. "On marginal likelihood computation in change-point models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3415-3429.
    6. Wang, Chen & Sun, Jiayi & Russell, Roddy & Daziano, Ricardo A., 2018. "Analyzing willingness to improve the resilience of New York City's transportation system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 10-19.
    7. Tinessa, Fiore & Marzano, Vittorio & Papola, Andrea, 2020. "Mixing distributions of tastes with a Combination of Nested Logit (CoNL) kernel: Formulation and performance analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1-23.
    8. Nima Nonejad, 2013. "Long Memory and Structural Breaks in Realized Volatility: An Irreversible Markov Switching Approach," CREATES Research Papers 2013-26, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    9. Akshay Vij & Rico Krueger, 2018. "Random taste heterogeneity in discrete choice models: Flexible nonparametric finite mixture distributions," Papers 1802.02299, arXiv.org.
    10. Angel Bujosa & Antoni Riera & Robert Hicks, 2010. "Combining Discrete and Continuous Representations of Preference Heterogeneity: A Latent Class Approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 47(4), pages 477-493, December.
    11. Vij, Akshay & Krueger, Rico, 2017. "Random taste heterogeneity in discrete choice models: Flexible nonparametric finite mixture distributions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 76-101.
    12. Managi, Shunsuke & Okimoto, Tatsuyoshi, 2013. "Does the price of oil interact with clean energy prices in the stock market?," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 1-9.
    13. Zhou, Heng & Norman, Richard & Xia, Jianhong(Cecilia) & Hughes, Brett & Kelobonye, Keone & Nikolova, Gabi & Falkmer, Torbjorn, 2020. "Analysing travel mode and airline choice using latent class modelling: A case study in Western Australia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 187-205.
    14. David Hensher & Andrew Collins & William Greene, 2013. "Accounting for attribute non-attendance and common-metric aggregation in a probabilistic decision process mixed multinomial logit model: a warning on potential confounding," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(5), pages 1003-1020, September.
    15. Sarrias, Mauricio & Daziano, Ricardo, 2017. "Multinomial Logit Models with Continuous and Discrete Individual Heterogeneity in R: The gmnl Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 79(i02).
    16. Rico Krueger & Akshay Vij & Taha H. Rashidi, 2018. "A Dirichlet Process Mixture Model of Discrete Choice," Papers 1801.06296, arXiv.org.
    17. Jia, Wenjian & Chen, T. Donna, 2023. "Investigating heterogeneous preferences for plug-in electric vehicles: Policy implications from different choice models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    18. Sfeir, Georges & Abou-Zeid, Maya & Rodrigues, Filipe & Pereira, Francisco Camara & Kaysi, Isam, 2021. "Latent class choice model with a flexible class membership component: A mixture model approach," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    19. Krueger, Rico & Rashidi, Taha H. & Vij, Akshay, 2020. "A Dirichlet process mixture model of discrete choice: Comparisons and a case study on preferences for shared automated vehicles," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    20. Yong Song & Tomasz Wo'zniak, 2020. "Markov Switching," Papers 2002.03598, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:67:y:2014:i:c:p:109-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.