IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v26y1992i2p135-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Highway pavement distress evaluation: Modeling measurement error

Author

Listed:
  • Humplick, Frannie

Abstract

There has been a proliferation of inspection technologies to quantify distresses on highway pavement systems. These technologies employ varying measurement principles and are subject to measurement errors. Estimates of measurement errors are therefore required in order to select among these techniques, and to get accurate assessments of pavement condition. There is abundant literature concerning techniques available for the numerical study of measurement errors. Available techniques include econometric methods of coping with errors in variables when investigating relationships between variables that have been measured with error; calibration approaches under various measurement conditions; and evaluation of measurement errors due to quantification, by a proxy, of concepts that are not directly measurable or observable. The methodologies employed in these techniques rely on certain assumptions for model development and estimation. These assumptions include the nature of error occurrence, whether systematic or random; the effect of these errors on the measured result, whether multiplicative or additive; and the level of knowledge about the true value of the measured object. Such assumptions may be violated under certain conditions. This paper identifies such situations and develops a generalized measurement error modeling approach, in which existing approaches are special cases. Existing methods are reviewed as to the specification models used to represent measurement errors; the types of errors accounted for in the suggested specification model; the type of errors not accounted for and the biases induced in estimated parameters by ignoring certain error types. The approach developed is capable of quantifying the accuracy of measurement for cases where the true value of the measured object is not known. This is the case in highway pavement distress evaluation as there is no single well-accepted technology which can be used as a proxy for the value for calibration purposes. The methodology developed in this paper explicitly estimates the true value and is applied to the calibration of new technologies for highway distress evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Humplick, Frannie, 1992. "Highway pavement distress evaluation: Modeling measurement error," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 135-154, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:26:y:1992:i:2:p:135-154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0191-2615(92)90004-G
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Prozzi, Jorge A, 2001. "Modeling Pavement Performance by Combining Field and Experimental Data," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1gx2425x, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Durango-Cohen, Pablo L., 2007. "A time series analysis framework for transportation infrastructure management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 493-505, June.
    3. Mishalani, Rabi G. & Koutsopoulos, Haris N., 2002. "Modeling the spatial behavior of infrastructure condition," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 171-194, February.
    4. Durango-Cohen, Pablo L. & Madanat, Samer M., 2008. "Optimization of inspection and maintenance decisions for infrastructure facilities under performance model uncertainty: A quasi-Bayes approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 1074-1085, October.
    5. Prozzi, J A & Madanat, S M, 2004. "Development of Pavement Performance Models by Combining Experimental and Field Data," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6cf8v5cw, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Madanat, S M & Durango, Pablo L & Guillaumot, Vincent M, 2002. "Adaptive Optimization of Infrastructure Maintenance and Inspection Decisions under Performance Model Uncertainty," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2jj604pk, University of California Transportation Center.
    7. Swei, Omar & Gillen, David & Onayev, Anuarbek, 2021. "Improving productivity measures of producing transportation infrastructure using quality-adjusted price indices," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 372-381.
    8. Chu, Chih-Yuan & Durango-Cohen, Pablo L., 2008. "Estimation of dynamic performance models for transportation infrastructure using panel data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 57-81, January.
    9. Kobayashi, Kiyoshi & Kaito, Kiyoyuki & Lethanh, Nam, 2012. "A statistical deterioration forecasting method using hidden Markov model for infrastructure management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 544-561.
    10. Kuhn, Kenneth D. & Madanat, Samer M., 2005. "Robust Maintenance Policies in Asset Management," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt00z6g3pr, University of California Transportation Center.
    11. Mishalani, Rabi G. & Gong, Liying, 2009. "Optimal infrastructure condition sampling over space and time for maintenance decision-making under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 311-324, March.
    12. Kuhn, Kenneth D. & Madanat, Samer M., 2005. "Robust Maintenance Policies for Markovian Systems under Model Uncertainty," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1d85j6mt, University of California Transportation Center.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:26:y:1992:i:2:p:135-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.