IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v50y2013icp62-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public policy implications of harmonizing engineering technology with socio-economic modeling: Application to transportation infrastructure management

Author

Listed:
  • Andrijcic, E.
  • Haimes, Y.Y.
  • Beatley, T.

Abstract

The persistent infrastructure underinvestment coupled with a significant growth in commercial and non-commercial transportation demand has rendered the US transportation infrastructure unprepared for current and future demands. A significant improvement in the condition of the US transportation infrastructure must be grounded on a more sustainable and proactive approach to address the existing gap between short-term commitments and long-term needs. This paper demonstrates in quantitative terms the value of long-term investments to overcome the historical impediments to infrastructure rehabilitation, including the need for a proactive political structure that compensates for the apparent lack of public accountability, and for the poor understanding of the socio-economic effects caused by transportation infrastructure failures. Such a process could avoid impending catastrophes. This paper presents a modeling paradigm that accounts for multiple stakeholder perspectives and relates the formulation of public policy to a long-term horizon through the modeling of the transportation infrastructure as a system of systems. The methodology enables involved stakeholders and decision makers to visualize their shared interests and to promote coordinated individual decisions in order to achieve a more acceptable level of the overall system of systems objectives. To illustrate the relevance of the proposed modeling approach, we apply it to a bridge maintenance problem and we discuss the synthesis of existing engineering practice with socio-economic factors that aids in streamlining long-term infrastructure goals with immediate short-term needs. The insights obtained from the proposed system of systems methodological approach point to the need to adopt a more forward-looking and collaborative public policy for infrastructure maintenance.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrijcic, E. & Haimes, Y.Y. & Beatley, T., 2013. "Public policy implications of harmonizing engineering technology with socio-economic modeling: Application to transportation infrastructure management," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 62-73.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:50:y:2013:i:c:p:62-73
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856413000347
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhenyu Guo & Yacov Y. Haimes, 2016. "Risk Assessment of Infrastructure System of Systems with Precursor Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(8), pages 1630-1643, August.
    2. Shah Jahan Miah & HuyQuan Vu & John Gammack, 2019. "A big-data analytics method for capturing visitor activities and flows: the case of an island country," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 203-221, December.
    3. Agbelie, Bismark R.D.K. & Labi, Samuel & Sinha, Kumares C., 2017. "Estimating the marginal costs of bridge damage due to overweight vehicles using a modified equivalent-vehicle methodology and in-service data on life-cycle costs and usage," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 275-288.
    4. Wen, Qi & Qiang, Maoshan & Xia, Bingqing & An, Nan, 2019. "Discovering regulatory concerns on bridge management: An author-topic model based approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 161-170.
    5. Novak, D.C. & Sullivan, J.F. & Sentoff, K. & Dowds, J., 2020. "A framework to guide strategic disinvestment in roadway infrastructure considering social vulnerability," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 436-451.
    6. Chen, Jingxu & Wang, Shuaian & Liu, Zhiyuan & Guo, Yanyong, 2018. "Network-based optimization modeling of manhole setting for pipeline transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 38-55.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:50:y:2013:i:c:p:62-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.