IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v35y2001i3p197-224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a weight-assessing model to identify route choice criteria and information effects

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Ting-Yu
  • Chang, Hsin-Li
  • Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung

Abstract

Shortest-path (minimum travel time) routing has been adopted over the past few decades. However, many studies have shown that a driver's route and the shortest path differ widely in significant ways, and that most drivers use several criteria in selecting their routes. Since route choice criteria have been the subject of controversy, this study develops an individual behavioral-based mechanism for exploring the crucial criteria affecting drivers' route-selection decisions. On the basis of the weight-assessing model and the habitual domain theory, this study presents the dynamic change of route choice criteria according to their dynamic weights. Furthermore, the effects of information on drivers' route-formulating behaviors are investigated as well in order to provide some valuable suggestions for implementing Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS) in the future. An empirical study in Taipei City was conducted to show the feasibility and applicability of our proposed method and the empirical results indicate excellent performance in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Ting-Yu & Chang, Hsin-Li & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2001. "Using a weight-assessing model to identify route choice criteria and information effects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 197-224, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:35:y:2001:i:3:p:197-224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965-8564(99)00055-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khattak, Asad J. & Schofer, Joseph L. & Koppelman, Frank S., 1993. "Commuters' enroute diversion and return decisions: Analysis and implications for advanced traveler information systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 101-111, April.
    2. Caplice, Chris & Mahmassani, Hani S., 1992. "Aspects of commuting behavior: Preferred arrival time, use of information and switching propensity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 409-418, September.
    3. Yang, Hai & Kitamura, Ryuichi & Jovanis, Paul P. & Vaughn, Kenneth M. & Abdel-aty, Mohammed A. & Reddy, Prasuna Dvg, 1993. "Exploration Of Driver Route Choice With Advanced Traveler Information Using Neural Network Concepts," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt53d2t6df, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung & Chen, Ting-Yu & Wang, Jih-Chang, 1998. "A weight-assessing method with habitual domains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 342-367, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bittihn, Stefan & Schadschneider, Andreas, 2021. "The effect of modern traffic information on Braess’ paradox," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    2. Thomas, Tom & Tutert, Bas, 2015. "Route choice behavior in a radial structured urban network: Do people choose the orbital or the route through the city center?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 85-95.
    3. Jaap Vreeswijk & Tom Thomas & Eric Berkum & Bart Arem, 2014. "Perception bias in route choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(6), pages 1305-1321, November.
    4. Papinski, Dominik & Scott, Darren M., 2011. "A GIS-based toolkit for route choice analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 434-442.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard H. M. Emmerink & Paul van Beek, 1997. "Empirical Analysis of Work Schedule Flexibility: Implications for Road Pricing and Driver Information Systems," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(2), pages 217-234, February.
    2. Richard H. M. Emmerink & Peter Nijkamp & Piet Rietveld & Jos N. Van Ommeren & Richard H. M. Emmerink & Peter Nijkamp & Piet Rietveld & Jos N. Van Ommeren, 2004. "Variable Message Signs and Radio Traffic Information: An Integrated Empirical Analysis of Drivers’ Route Choice Behaviour," Chapters, in: Location, Travel and Information Technology, chapter 16, pages 343-361, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Hongcheng Gan & Xin Ye, 2013. "Investigation of drivers' diversion responses to urban freeway variable message signs displaying freeway and local street travel times," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(8), pages 651-668, December.
    4. Roszkowska, Ewa & Wachowicz, Tomasz, 2015. "Application of fuzzy TOPSIS to scoring the negotiation offers in ill-structured negotiation problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 920-932.
    5. Nijkamp, Peter & Reggiani, Aura & Tsang, Wai Fai, 2004. "Comparative modelling of interregional transport flows: Applications to multimodal European freight transport," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 584-602, June.
    6. Motamed, Moggan & Machemehl, Randy B., 2013. "Traveler Path Choice During Freeway Closure," 54th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Annapolis, Maryland, March 21-23, 2013 206956, Transportation Research Forum.
    7. Sophie Dantan & Julie Bulteau & Isabelle Nicolaï, 2015. "Potential demand for multimodal information. Evidence from the Plateau-de-Saclay," Post-Print hal-01799290, HAL.
    8. Hai Yang, 1999. "Evaluating the benefits of a combined route guidance and road pricing system in a traffic network with recurrent congestion," Transportation, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 299-322, August.
    9. Roman Vavrek, 2019. "Evaluation of the Impact of Selected Weighting Methods on the Results of the TOPSIS Technique," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(06), pages 1821-1843, November.
    10. Casper G. Chorus & Harry J.P. Timmermans, 2011. "Personal Intelligent Travel Assistants," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 25, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Zhang, Michael & Shen, Wei & Nie, Yu & Ma, Jingtao, 2008. "Integrated Construction Zone Traffic Management," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1bd50918, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    12. Dragan Pamučar & Fatih Ecer & Goran Cirovic & Melfi A. Arlasheedi, 2020. "Application of Improved Best Worst Method (BWM) in Real-World Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Malavasi, Gabriele & Ricci, Stefano, 2001. "Simulation of stochastic elements in railway systems using self-learning processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 262-272, June.
    14. Moussa Larbani & Po Lung Yu, 2020. "Empowering Data Mining Sciences by Habitual Domains Theory, Part I: The Concept of Wonderful Solution," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 373-397, September.
    15. Zheng Zhu & Xiqun Chen & Chenfeng Xiong & Lei Zhang, 2018. "A mixed Bayesian network for two-dimensional decision modeling of departure time and mode choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1499-1522, September.
    16. Thill, Jean-Claude & Rogova, Galina & Yan, Jun, 2004. "Evaluating Benefits And Costs Of Intelligent Transportation Systems Elements From A Planning Perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 571-603, January.
    17. Chen, Ting-Yu & Chang, Hsin-Li & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2002. "Using fuzzy measures and habitual domains to analyze the public attitude and apply to the gas taxi policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 145-161, February.
    18. Sophie Dantan & Julie Bulteau & Isabelle Nicolaï, 2015. "Hurried or Risk-adverse Travelers: who will Pay More for Multimodal Information?," Post-Print hal-04362230, HAL.
    19. Khattak, Asad & Kanafani, Adib & Le Colletter, Emmanuel, 1994. "Stated And Reported Route Diversion Behavior: Implications On The Benefits Of ATIS," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt4fz4h20k, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    20. Cristina Pronello & Amandine Duboz & Valentina Rappazzo, 2017. "Towards Smarter Urban Mobility: Willingness to Pay for an Advanced Traveller Information System in Lyon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-21, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:35:y:2001:i:3:p:197-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.