IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v34y2010i11p747-759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking the strategic actions of Iran mobile cellular telecommunication using two models of fuzzy QFD

Author

Listed:
  • Khademi-Zare, Hassan
  • Zarei, Mahnaz
  • Sadeghieh, Ahmad
  • Saleh Owlia, Mohammad

Abstract

Mobile cellular telecommunication success in target markets first requires ranking the customer's expectations and then prioritizing the engineering characteristics (ECs) to meet the expectations. In this paper, two prioritization models based on quality function deployment (QFD) are developed to rank the strategic actions (SAs), or the ECs of Iran mobile cellular telecommunication. QFD is a widely used customer-driven tool for which the success of its applications may be the result of some of its benefits, such as greater customer focus. It uses a matrix called House of Quality (HOQ) to translate Customer Attributes (CAs) into ECs. However, due to the high degree of subjectivity in constructing the HOQ, the application of fuzzy logic provides an efficient tool to handle the subjective assessments. On the other hand, taking into consideration the gap between the current state and the positive ideal state for each CA, TOPSIS is used to rank CAs in a first model. In addition, in a second model, using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), more criteria are taken into consideration in ranking CAs. Also, a fuzzy utility factor, Bj, is used to rank SAs in both models. Both presented models have the ability to capture the vagueness of human thinking style, and let customer oriented organizations, such as MCI, derive benefits from the voice of the customer (VOC) in a more expressive way.

Suggested Citation

  • Khademi-Zare, Hassan & Zarei, Mahnaz & Sadeghieh, Ahmad & Saleh Owlia, Mohammad, 2010. "Ranking the strategic actions of Iran mobile cellular telecommunication using two models of fuzzy QFD," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 747-759, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:34:y:2010:i:11:p:747-759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596110001175
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morteza Yazdani & Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2016. "New integration of MCDM methods and QFD in the selection of green suppliers," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 1097-1113, November.
    2. Ouenniche, Jamal & Pérez-Gladish, Blanca & Bouslah, Kais, 2018. "An out-of-sample framework for TOPSIS-based classifiers with application in bankruptcy prediction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 111-116.
    3. Claudia Margarita Acuña-Soto & Vicente Liern & Blanca Pérez-Gladish, 2020. "Multiple criteria performance evaluation of YouTube mathematical educational videos by IS-TOPSIS," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2017-2039, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:34:y:2010:i:11:p:747-759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.