The Fisherian prescription of reporting P-values as a summary of a result, as compared to the Neyman-Pearson system of acceptance or rejection of a null hypothesis, is more common in applied science. This popularity is largely due to the fact that the P-value provides a more complete, meaningful and useful evidence regarding the null hypothesis. Conventionally, P-values are defined in the context of one-sided alternatives, although there exist some ideas in the literature concerning two-sided alternatives; see e.g. [Gibbons, J.D., Pratt, J.W., 1975. P-values: Interpretation and methodology. American Statistician 24, 20-25; George, E.O., Mudholkar, G.S., 1990. P-values for two-sided tests. Biometrical Journal 32, 747-751]. This note takes an axiomatic approach for defining P-values which involves at most ordering of the alternatives but is not restricted by their nature. It also involves a correspondence between a P-value and the associated level [alpha] test for each [alpha]. A P-value turns out to be valid if and only if the associated level [alpha] test is unbiased in the traditional sense for each [alpha]. Furthermore, it is shown that the resulting optimal tests agree with those given by the Neyman-Person framework when the ordering is stochastic. Thus, a theory based on optimal P-values parallels to the Neyman-Pearson theory and bridges the two approaches to testing of hypotheses.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 79 (2009) Issue (Month): 18 (September) Pages: 1963-1971 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Did you know? Citation analysis on IDEAS includes online papers that are freely accessible and whose text could be automatically analyzed, currently about 210000 papers.