Empirical saddlepoint approximations of the Studentized ratio and regression estimates for finite populations
AbstractWe obtain saddlepoint approximations for tail probabilities of the Studentized ratio and regression estimates of the population mean for a simple random sample taken without replacement from a finite population. This is only possible if we know the entire population, so we also obtain empirical saddlepoint approximations based on the sample alone. These empirical approximations can be used for tests of significance and confidence intervals for the population mean. We compare the empirical approximation to the true saddlepoint approximation, both theoretically and numerically. The empirical saddlepoint is related to a bootstrap method for finite populations and we give numerical comparisons of these. We show that for data which contains extreme outliers, poor approximations can be obtained in the case of regression estimates, both for the saddlepoint and empirical saddlepoint, but for less extreme data the saddlepoint and empirical saddlepoint approximations are extremely close to the corresponding Monte Carlo and bootstrap approximations.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal Statistics & Probability Letters.
Volume (Year): 71 (2005)
Issue (Month): 3 (March)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Dai, Wen & Robinson, John, 2001. "Empirical saddlepoint approximations of the Studentized mean under simple random sampling," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 331-337, June.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.