IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v62y2003i1p87-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the maximum total sample size of a group sequential test about binomial proportions

Author

Listed:
  • Kepner, James L.
  • Chang, Myron N.

Abstract

It is well known that the standard single-stage binomial test is uniformly most powerful to detect an increase or decrease in a binomial proportion. The general perception is that, to achieve a fixed significance level and power, a group sequential test will require a larger maximum total sample size than required by the corresponding standard single-stage test because missing observations are possible under the group sequential test setting. In this article, it is proved that, under mild conditions, there exist group sequential tests which achieve the predesignated significance level and power with maximum total sample size bounded above by the sample size for the corresponding standard single-stage test.

Suggested Citation

  • Kepner, James L. & Chang, Myron N., 2003. "On the maximum total sample size of a group sequential test about binomial proportions," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 87-92, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:62:y:2003:i:1:p:87-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(02)00436-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu, Jihnhee & Kepner, James L., 2011. "On the maximum total sample size of a group sequential test about bivariate binomial proportions," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(7), pages 829-835, July.
    2. Yu, Jihnhee & Kepner, James L. & Bundy, Brian N., 2007. "Exact power calculations for detecting hypotheses involving two correlated binary outcomes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 288-294, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:62:y:2003:i:1:p:87-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.