IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v24y1995i2p177-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on the accuracy of an approximate interval for the binomial parameter

Author

Listed:
  • Huwang, Longcheen

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the problem whether the coverage probability of a well-known asymptotic confidence interval for the binomial parameter p, derived by the central limit theorem, is uniformly convergent. On the basis of several good properties this interval possesses, it seems reasonable for statisticians to conjecture that it has the uniform asymptotic confidence coefficient equal to the nominal coefficient. Surprisingly, as will be shown in this article, this conjecture is not correct for the commonly adopted nominal coefficients. Especially, this interval has a zero uniform asymptotic confidence coefficient when the nominal coefficient is less than 0.5205.

Suggested Citation

  • Huwang, Longcheen, 1995. "A note on the accuracy of an approximate interval for the binomial parameter," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 177-180, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:24:y:1995:i:2:p:177-180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167-7152(94)00166-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weizhen Wang, 2015. "Exact Optimal Confidence Intervals for Hypergeometric Parameters," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(512), pages 1491-1499, December.
    2. Weizhen Wang & Zhongzhan Zhang, 2014. "Asymptotic infimum coverage probability for interval estimation of proportions," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 77(5), pages 635-646, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:24:y:1995:i:2:p:177-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.