IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v21y1994i1p27-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on min--maxbias estimators in approximately linear models

Author

Listed:
  • Bassett, Gilbert W.

Abstract

The approximately linear model represents deviations from the ideal linear model by a vector contained in a prescribed bias-ball. In a recent paper Mathew and Nordstrom (1993) proposed min--maxbias estimators in which a criterion function is defined by maximizing errors over the bias-ball. When the Chebyshev norm defines the bias-ball they found the least absolute deviation or L1 estimator to be identical to its maxbias version. This was thought to be a robustness property since it contrasts with least squares where the maxbias criterion is a combination of L1 and the sum of squares. In this paper it is shown, however, that equivalence between the L1 estimator and its min--maxbias version is not special to L1 and that the equivalence is valid for estimates that are not robust. Hence, while the L1 estimate does have desirable robustness properties the equivalence to its min--maxbias version cannot be counted as one of them.

Suggested Citation

  • Bassett, Gilbert W., 1994. "A note on min--maxbias estimators in approximately linear models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 27-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:21:y:1994:i:1:p:27-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167-7152(94)90054-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:21:y:1994:i:1:p:27-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.