IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v19y1994i5p361-370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Desirable properties, breakdown and efficiency in the linear regression model

Author

Listed:
  • Davies, Laurie

Abstract

The Neyman--Pearson Lemma introduced the concept of optimality into statistics. The derivation of optimal procedures has since dominated non-Bayesian mathematical statistics. This article criticizes the use of optimality as it operates only within a class of models whose adequacy is not checkable on the basis of the optimal procedure. Furthermore empirically indistinguishable models may have radically different optimal procedures. In Section 2 it is argued that the derivation of optimal procedures should be replaced by the construction of procedures with given properties. Section 3 is concerned with one such property, namely a high breakdown point, in the context of the linear regression model. The ability of high breakdown procedures to deal with outliers and non-linearities is discussed. Section 4 deals with the concept of efficiency. It is argued that 'efficiency at the model' it not suitable as a criterion for choosing an estimator as efficiency depends on the choice of the model. Finally in Section 5 the relationship between breakdown and efficiency in the linear regression model is discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Davies, Laurie, 1994. "Desirable properties, breakdown and efficiency in the linear regression model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 361-370, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:19:y:1994:i:5:p:361-370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167-7152(94)90004-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:19:y:1994:i:5:p:361-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.