IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v18y1993i3p169-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appropriate penalties in the final prediction error criterion: a decision theoretic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Ping
  • Krieger, Abba M.

Abstract

The final prediction error (FPE) criterion has been used widely in model selection. The criterion for a linear regression model with k parameters can be written as RSS(k) + [lambda]k2, where RSS(k) is the residual sums of squares, 2 is an unbiased estimate of the error variance and [lambda] is a penalty for complexity. This article considers the simplest situation where the choice is between two Gaussian linear regression models with 2 assumed to be known. We define a signal to noise ratio b for a regression model and use b to restrict the parameter space. The loss function is chosen to be the squared prediction error. Values of [lambda] that are minimax and values of [lambda] that are admissible are found as a function of b.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Ping & Krieger, Abba M., 1993. "Appropriate penalties in the final prediction error criterion: a decision theoretic approach," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 169-177, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:18:y:1993:i:3:p:169-177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167-7152(93)90212-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuanfang Du & Shibing You, 2022. "Interaction among Air Pollution, National Health, and Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:18:y:1993:i:3:p:169-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.