The social dimensions of safety incident reporting in maternity care: The influence of working relationships and group processes
AbstractOver the past twenty years there has been a growing awareness of the scale and cost of adverse events in health care. In this paper we discuss findings from a study, undertaken in 2008, investigating social and cultural influences on incident reporting in maternity care in one UK National Health Service hospital. Maternity claims account for 50% of NHS compensation expenditure, with claims arising from poor fetal heart monitoring alone amounting to £85.8 million in 2010. Earlier studies on incident reporting used case note review and staff self-reports. We used ethnographic methods to highlight the social nature of, and social processes around, incident reporting, and the use of the collegial work group as an aid to decision-making. Incident reporting was rarely an isolated, private event, but the result of a process involving group deliberation. We suggest that incident reporting in health care should be regarded as a process rather than an event and reporting policies adjusted to accommodate group processes in order to improve reporting rates. While the paper presents findings from a single site we suggest these may add to the understanding of reporting in other care areas of health care. The key contribution this paper makes is to report the existence of a process of worker peer conferral as a decision-making aid prior to incident reporting.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.
Volume (Year): 75 (2012)
Issue (Month): 10 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Dixon-Woods, Mary & Suokas, Anu & Pitchforth, Emma & Tarrant, Carolyn, 2009. "An ethnographic study of classifying and accounting for risk at the sharp end of medical wards," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 362-369, August.
- Waring, Justin J., 2005. "Beyond blame: cultural barriers to medical incident reporting," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(9), pages 1927-1935, May.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.