IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v74y2012i3p372-380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Professional projects and institutional change in healthcare: The case of American dentistry

Author

Listed:
  • Kitchener, Martin
  • Mertz, Elizabeth

Abstract

This paper combines resources from the organization studies and sociology literatures to advance understanding of institutional change processes in healthcare that emerge from the professionalization projects of occupations. Conceptually, we introduce a model that combines the ‘archetype’ approach to analyzing structural change with a framework for analyzing the agency of emergent professions. We then employ the model to frame a historical case analysis (1972–2009) of the highly contested process by which the occupation of dental hygiene in the US fought to introduce a new organizational form, the alternative practice hygiene (APH) archetype. This archetype challenges the traditional model (the dentist’s office archetype) that is supported by the dominant dentistry profession. Our analysis contributes two main sets of empirical findings. First, we present a systematic comparison of the APH and Dentist’s Office archetypes in terms of their belief systems, formal structures, agents, and policy implications (e.g., access to services). Second, we provide an account of the agency of dental hygienists’ attempts to secure the APH model as part of their professionalization project.

Suggested Citation

  • Kitchener, Martin & Mertz, Elizabeth, 2012. "Professional projects and institutional change in healthcare: The case of American dentistry," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 372-380.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:74:y:2012:i:3:p:372-380
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953610007288
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adams, Tracey L., 2004. "Inter-professional conflict and professionalization: dentistry and dental hygiene in Ontario," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(11), pages 2243-2252, June.
    2. Salhani, Daniel & Coulter, Ian, 2009. "The politics of interprofessional working and the struggle for professional autonomy in nursing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1221-1228, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ong, Bie Nio & Morden, Andrew & Brooks, Lauren & Porcheret, Mark & Edwards, John J. & Sanders, Tom & Jinks, Clare & Dziedzic, Krysia, 2014. "Changing policy and practice: Making sense of national guidelines for osteoarthritis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 101-109.
    2. Berghout, Mathilde A. & Oldenhof, Lieke & Fabbricotti, Isabelle N. & Hilders, Carina G.J.M., 2018. "Discursively framing physicians as leaders: Institutional work to reconfigure medical professionalism," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 68-75.
    3. Currie, Graeme & Dingwall, Robert & Kitchener, Martin & Waring, Justin, 2012. "Let’s dance: Organization studies, medical sociology and health policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 273-280.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Traynor, Michael & Boland, Maggie & Buus, Niels, 2010. "Professional autonomy in 21st century healthcare: Nurses' accounts of clinical decision-making," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(8), pages 1506-1512, October.
    2. Grace, Matthew K. & VanHeuvelen, Jane S., 2019. "Occupational variation in burnout among medical staff: Evidence for the stress of higher status," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 199-208.
    3. Petrakaki, Dimitra & Klecun, Ela & Cornford, Tony, 2016. "Changes in healthcare professional work afforded by technology: the introduction of a national electronic patient record in an English hospital," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59475, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Liberati, Elisa Giulia & Gorli, Mara & Scaratti, Giuseppe, 2016. "Invisible walls within multidisciplinary teams: Disciplinary boundaries and their effects on integrated care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 31-39.
    5. Liberati, Elisa Giulia, 2017. "Separating, replacing, intersecting: The influence of context on the construction of the medical-nursing boundary," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 135-143.
    6. Johannessen, Lars E.F., 2018. "Workplace assimilation and professional jurisdiction: How nurses learn to blur the nursing-medical boundary," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 51-58.
    7. Skountridaki, Lila, 2017. "Barriers to business relations between medical tourism facilitators and medical professionals," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 254-266.
    8. Motulsky, Aude & Sicotte, Claude & Lamothe, Lise & Winslade, Nancy & Tamblyn, Robyn, 2011. "Electronic prescriptions and disruptions to the jurisdiction of community pharmacists," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 121-128, July.
    9. Nugus, Peter & Greenfield, David & Travaglia, Joanne & Westbrook, Johanna & Braithwaite, Jeffrey, 2010. "How and where clinicians exercise power: Interprofessional relations in health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 898-909, September.
    10. Boateng, Godfred O. & Adams, Tracey L., 2016. "“Drop dead … I need your job”: An exploratory study of intra-professional conflict amongst nurses in two Ontario cities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 35-42.
    11. Liff, Roy & Wikström, Ewa, 2015. "The problem-avoiding multi professional team—On the need to overcome protective routines," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 266-278.
    12. Powell, Alison E. & Davies, Huw T.O., 2012. "The struggle to improve patient care in the face of professional boundaries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(5), pages 807-814.
    13. Kroezen, M. & Mistiaen, P. & van Dijk, L. & Groenewegen, P.P. & Francke, A.L., 2014. "Negotiating jurisdiction in the workplace: A multiple-case study of nurse prescribing in hospital settings," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 107-115.
    14. Petrakaki, Dimitra & Barber, Nick & Waring, Justin, 2012. "The possibilities of technology in shaping healthcare professionals: (Re/De-)Professionalisation of pharmacists in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 429-437.
    15. Wilson, Gavin J & Wordley, Valerie & Grocock, Ryan & Shah, Sagar & Devalia, Urshla & Iricijan, Julija & Sayma, Meelad & Adelaja, Ini & MacLachlan, Greta & Ormond, Martyn & Hurley, Sara, 2023. "Utilising the dental workforce in England, United Kingdom, to optimise the response to COVID-19," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    16. Morris M. Kleiner & Kyoung Won Park, 2010. "Battles Among Licensed Occupations: Analyzing Government Regulations on Labor Market Outcomes for Dentists and Hygienists," NBER Working Papers 16560, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:74:y:2012:i:3:p:372-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.