Socioeconomic context and gastroschisis: Exploring associations at various geographic scales
AbstractThis study examines associations between area-level socioeconomic factors and the birth defect gastroschisis in order to further our understanding of the etiology of this condition. Specifically, this study explores how measuring socioeconomic conditions at different geographic scales affect the results of statistical models. A population-based case-control study of resident live births was conducted using data from the North Carolina Birth Defect Monitoring Program and the North Carolina composite linked birth files from 1998 through 2004. Neighborhood conditions potentially related to gastroschisis (poverty, unemployment, education, and racial composition) were measured using Census 2000 data and aggregated to several geographic scales. The Brown-Forsythe test of homogeneity of variance was used to select the neighborhood size by examining the effect of neighborhood size on variation in gastroschisis rates. To examine our assumptions about neighborhood size and neighborhood effects on gastroschisis, we estimated a series of logistic regression and multilevel logistic regression models. The Brown-Forsythe test suggested an optimal neighborhood size with a circular radius of approximately 2500 m, which was supported by the statistical analysis. Results indicate a weak association between living in a neighborhood characterized by high poverty and unemployment and an elevated risk of a gastroschisis-affected pregnancy after adjusting for individual-level risk factors. Cross-level interactions indicate that women in low poverty neighborhoods who do not rely on Medicaid have a significantly lower risk of gastroschisis. The choice of neighborhood scale influences model results suggesting that socioeconomic processes may influence health outcomes variably at different scales.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.
Volume (Year): 72 (2011)
Issue (Month): 4 (February)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.