IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v68y2009i4p625-630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is population mixing associated with childhood type 1 diabetes in Canterbury, New Zealand?

Author

Listed:
  • Miller, Laura J.
  • Pearce, Jamie
  • Barnett, Ross
  • Willis, Jinny A.
  • Darlow, Brian A.
  • Scott, Russell S.

Abstract

There is growing evidence to support a role for infections in the aetiology of childhood type 1 diabetes. However, previous studies suggest that infections can either protect against or initiate type 1 diabetes onset, depending on the timing of exposure. Population mixing has recently been employed as a proxy measure for area-level infectious exposure in childhood diabetes research. Research has found that the incidence of type 1 diabetes tends to be higher in areas with low population mixing, suggesting that children with low infectious exposure in early life have increased susceptibility to the disease. Subsequent exposure to infection could act as the final trigger to type 1 diabetes development. We assess whether an increase in population mixing over a short time period is associated with a higher incidence of type 1 diabetes. We test this hypothesis using data on childhood type 1 diabetes from the Canterbury region in New Zealand for the period 1999-2004, and population mixing change measures derived from the 1996 and 2001 censuses. We found that the incidence of type 1 diabetes was higher in areas where population mixing had increased the most. This effect was small, but remained significant after adjustment for potential confounding variables. The findings suggest that large increases in population mixing, over short time periods, could act as a trigger for type 1 diabetes development in children.

Suggested Citation

  • Miller, Laura J. & Pearce, Jamie & Barnett, Ross & Willis, Jinny A. & Darlow, Brian A. & Scott, Russell S., 2009. "Is population mixing associated with childhood type 1 diabetes in Canterbury, New Zealand?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 625-630, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:68:y:2009:i:4:p:625-630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(08)00616-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:68:y:2009:i:4:p:625-630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.