IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v62y2006i10p2513-2525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Could the peer group explain school differences in pupil smoking rates? An exploratory study

Author

Listed:
  • Turner, Katrina
  • West, Patrick
  • Gordon, Jacki
  • Young, Robert
  • Sweeting, Helen

Abstract

Schools differ in the proportion of their pupils who smoke. Such differences transcend pupil intake characteristics and relate to the internal life of the school. Although adolescents' smoking behaviour has been associated with that of their peers, little consideration has been given to whether peer structures and processes contribute to school differences in pupil smoking rates. In two relatively deprived Scottish schools, one with a higher and one with a lower rate of pupil smoking, 13 and 15 year-olds were surveyed. Sociometric data and information on pupils' smoking behaviour and views were gathered. Twenty-five single-sex discussion groups were then held with a sub-sample of the 13 year-olds in order to explore in detail their views on smoking, smokers and fellow pupils. Findings showed that in the higher smoking school, pupils were more often in groups, smokers were identified as popular, and attitudes (especially among non-smoking females) were more pro-smoking. In the lower smoking school, by contrast, there were more isolates and dyads, there were no popular smokers and attitudes (especially among non-smoking females) were much less pro-smoking. Thus, evidence suggests peer group structures and related influences could be one explanation for school differences in smoking, and that the popularity of smokers together with the views of non-smoking females may be particularly important in creating such differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Turner, Katrina & West, Patrick & Gordon, Jacki & Young, Robert & Sweeting, Helen, 2006. "Could the peer group explain school differences in pupil smoking rates? An exploratory study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2513-2525, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:62:y:2006:i:10:p:2513-2525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(05)00610-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michell, Lynn & Amos, Amanda, 1997. "Girls, pecking order and smoking," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 44(12), pages 1861-1869, June.
    2. Aveyard, Paul & Markham, Wolfgang A & Lancashire, Emma & Bullock, Alison & Macarthur, Christine & Cheng, K. K. & Daniels, Harry, 2004. "The influence of school culture on smoking among pupils," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(9), pages 1767-1780, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael S. Pollard & Harold D. Green & David P. Kennedy & Myong-Hyun Go & Joan S. Tucker, 2013. "Adolescent Friendship Networks and Trajectories of Binge Drinking," Working Papers WR-998, RAND Corporation.
    2. Tracy J. Evans-Whipp & Lyndal Bond & Obioha C. Ukoumunne & John W. Toumbourou & Richard F. Catalano, 2010. "The Impact of School Tobacco Policies on Student Smoking in Washington State, United States and Victoria, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sutherland, Alex, 2012. "Is parental socio-economic status related to the initiation of substance abuse by young people in an English city? An event history analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(7), pages 1053-1061.
    2. Christina N. Wysota & Marina Topuridze & Zhanna Sargsyan & Ana Dekanosidze & Lela Sturua & Michelle C. Kegler & Varduhi Petrosyan & Arusyak Harutyunyan & Varduhi Hayrumyan & Carla J. Berg, 2021. "Psychosocial Factors, Smoke-Free Restrictions, and Media Exposure in Relation to Smoking-Related Attitudes and Behaviors among Adults in Armenia and Georgia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Fujimoto, Kayo & Valente, Thomas W., 2015. "Multiplex congruity: Friendship networks and perceived popularity as correlates of adolescent alcohol use," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 173-181.
    4. Juan David Robalino & Michael Macy, 2018. "Peer effects on adolescent smoking: Are popular teens more influential?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, July.
    5. Östberg, Viveca & Modin, Bitte, 2008. "Status relations in school and their relevance for health in a life course perspective: Findings from the Aberdeen children of the 1950's cohort study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(4), pages 835-848, February.
    6. Wolfgang A. Markham & Alan Dolan & Graham F. Moore, 2021. "A Sociological Framework to Reduce Aberrant Behaviour of School Students Through Increasing School Connectedness," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    7. Ana Balsa & Carlos Díaz, 2018. "Social interactions in health behaviors and conditions," Documentos de Trabajo/Working Papers 1802, Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Economia. Universidad de Montevideo..
    8. West, Patrick & Sweeting, Helen & Young, Robert & Kelly, Shona, 2010. "The relative importance of family socioeconomic status and school-based peer hierarchies for morning cortisol in youth: An exporatory study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1246-1253, April.
    9. Sudeshna Paul & A. James O'Malley, 2013. "Hierarchical longitudinal models of relationships in social networks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(5), pages 705-722, November.
    10. Vishesh Karwa & Pavel N. Krivitsky & Aleksandra B. Slavković, 2017. "Sharing social network data: differentially private estimation of exponential family random-graph models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(3), pages 481-500, April.
    11. Gil, Luciana A. & Kwon, Kyoung-Nan & Good, Linda K. & Johnson, Lester W., 2012. "Impact of self on attitudes toward luxury brands among teens," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(10), pages 1425-1433.
    12. Elovainio, Marko & Pietikäinen, Minna & Luopa, Pauliina & Kivimäki, Mika & Ferrie, Jane E. & Jokela, Jukka & Suominen, Sakari & Vahtera, Jussi & Virtanen, Marianna, 2011. "Organizational justice at school and its associations with pupils’ psychosocial school environment, health, and wellbeing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(12), pages 1675-1682.
    13. Harsh Gupta & Mason A. Porter, 2020. "Mixed Logit Models and Network Formation," Papers 2006.16516, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    14. Robalino, Juan David, 2016. "Smoking Peer Effects among Adolescents: Are Popular Teens More Influential?," IZA Discussion Papers 9714, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. O’Malley, A. James & Paul, Sudeshna, 2015. "Using retrospective sampling to estimate models of relationship status in large longitudinal social networks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 35-46.
    16. Fotouhi, Babak & Rytina, Steven, 2018. "Mathematical Modeling and Inference for Degree-capped Ego-centric Network Sampling," SocArXiv 5kez8, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:62:y:2006:i:10:p:2513-2525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.