IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v59y2004i3p637-651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Authorizing tradition: vectors of contention in Highland Maya midwifery

Author

Listed:
  • Hinojosa, Servando Z.

Abstract

In Guatemala, midwives deliver the majority of children and play an important health care role in rural areas. Maya midwives, using time-proven methods, are the chief providers of care for mothers and infants in these areas. In recent decades, however, the medical establishment has become interested in Maya midwives, and is currently engaged in training and certifying many of them. This study examines how Guatemalan health authorities have sought to change Maya midwifery, refashioning its vocational framework and retooling it in accordance with Western medical principles. I focus on the place of obligatory formal training and the use of biomedical materials in the experience of Kaqchikel Maya midwives, and consider how the health officials employ these means to undermine the midwives' knowledge base. Encounters between midwives and formal health personnel reveal an ongoing privileging of biomedical knowledge, one that preserves asymmetrical relationships between these practitioners. This creates an environment favorable to health personnel, and helps them to extend their influence through the midwives into the community. Given this, I contend that health personnel value local Maya midwives primarily for their role in furthering the goals of biomedicine.

Suggested Citation

  • Hinojosa, Servando Z., 2004. "Authorizing tradition: vectors of contention in Highland Maya midwifery," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 637-651, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:59:y:2004:i:3:p:637-651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(03)00594-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:59:y:2004:i:3:p:637-651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.