IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v59y2004i1p83-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision-making models in Japanese psychiatry: Transitions from passive to active patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Slingsby, B. T.

Abstract

This study deconstructs the current dynamics of the physician-patient relationship in the treatment of minor mood disorders including depression in Japan. An in-depth qualitative investigation was conducted on psychiatrists employed at mental health clinics, university hospitals, and psychiatric hospitals. Triangulation was conducted concurrently using key informant interviews and periodic non-structured interviews with additional physicians and patients. Results revealed two patterns of omakase (entrusting) (Omakase Model) and an emerging pattern of patient participation in decision making (Participatory Model). The pattern traditionally denoted by the Omakase Model encompasses an active and passive entrusting model. The phenomenon of an emerging Participatory Model was uncovered whereby an in-depth analysis led to an understanding behind the associative physician-patient relationship, communication patterns, and a patient's level of awareness. It was found that while active participation in medical decision making is capable of raising the level of treatment efficacy, it is not only active participation in medical decision making, but also active participation in medical treatment that is valued in the physician-patient relationship. Ultimately, a patient actively participates in his or her medical treatment under either the active Omakase Model or Participatory Model, be it entrusting or participatory. Consequently, the active Omakase Model will continue to remain functional alongside the Participatory Model while the passive Omakase Model is likely to fade away in time.

Suggested Citation

  • Slingsby, B. T., 2004. "Decision-making models in Japanese psychiatry: Transitions from passive to active patterns," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 83-91, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:59:y:2004:i:1:p:83-91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(03)00542-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:59:y:2004:i:1:p:83-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.