What lies behind the subjective evaluation of health status?
AbstractThe evaluation of health or subjective health (SH) is considered a legitimate indicator of overall health status, providing a valid, reliable and cost-effective means of health assessment. This study looks at factors reported by respondents as influencing their SH, it analyzes to which extent people compare themselves with others when evaluating their health, and examines the difference between people with optimal or sub-optimal SH. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 383 Israeli residents. Three models for judging health status were identified: the biomedical or disease oriented, the emotional or "general feeling", and the functional-related model. The reported influence of some factors for the evaluation of health changed by age and by level of subjective health. Respondents with sub-optimal health reported tiredness and pain as more influential. Most interviewees spontaneously reported comparing their health to reference groups. Age and level of subjective health were associated with the way people compare their health to others. The young reporting sub-optimal health did not compare themselves to people their age, but a high percentage of the old did so. Among those with excellent health, the young rather than the old were more likely to compare themselves to people their age. These findings imply that each individual tries to find ways to evaluate his/her health in a more positive light. When old and not healthy they tend to compare themselves to friends or people their age, but if young and not healthy they do not perform the comparison so as not to feel worse. Understanding how people evaluate their health can contribute to the conceptual development of subjective health.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.
Volume (Year): 56 (2003)
Issue (Month): 8 (April)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Neil J Buckley & Frank T Denton & A Leslie Robb & Byron G Spencer, 2005.
"Socioeconomic Influences on the Health of Older Canadians: Estimates Based on Two Longitudinal Surveys,"
Quantitative Studies in Economics and Population Research Reports
402, McMaster University.
- Neil J. Buckley & Frank T. Denton & A. Leslie Robb & Byron G. Spencer, 2006. "Socio-economic Influences on the Health of Older Canadians: Estimates Based on Two Longitudinal Surveys," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 32(1), pages 59-84, March.
- Neil J Buckley & Frank T Denton & A Leslie Robb & Byron G Spencer, 2005. "Socioeconomic Influences on the Health of Older Canadians: Estimates Based on Two Longitudinal Surveys," Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population Research Papers 139, McMaster University.
- Powdthavee, Nattavudh, 2009.
"Ill-health as a household norm: Evidence from other people's health problems,"
Social Science & Medicine,
Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 251-259, January.
- N Powdthavee, 2008. "Ill-Health as a Household Norm: Evidence from Other People's Health Problems," Discussion Papers 08/21, Department of Economics, University of York.
- Guerrero, Ana M. & Herrero, Carmen, 2005. "A semi-separable utility function for health profiles," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 33-54, January.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.