IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v55y2002i2p257-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning to live with glaucoma: a qualitative study of diagnosis and the impact of sight loss

Author

Listed:
  • Green, Judith
  • Siddall, Helen
  • Murdoch, Ian

Abstract

Glaucoma is a major cause of preventable sight loss. As there are no obvious symptoms in the early stages, when it is most beneficial to start treatment, the key to reducing undiagnosed glaucoma in the community is better case finding among those at higher risk. This qualitative study aimed to identify triggers to self-referral for glaucoma symptoms in a sample from Britain, and to explore the meaning of symptoms for people living with moderate to severe glaucoma. Participants (N=28) reported low levels of awareness of glaucoma prior to their diagnosis, and had assumed that symptoms were the 'normal' deterioration of eyesight expected with other morbidity or advancing age. As symptoms have a gradual onset, participants had learnt to cope with diminishing sight ability. However, many reported that such coping was 'at a cost', and that managing in a world designed for the well sighted caused problems for activities of everyday living, work and family life. The salience of these problems was shaped primarily by social factors, which framed both the practical consequences of sight loss and their meaning for respondents. Findings from this study suggest health promotion is a priority to increase public awareness of the existence and symptoms of glaucoma among those at high risk, and that more attention could be given to reducing the environmental and social causes of disability.

Suggested Citation

  • Green, Judith & Siddall, Helen & Murdoch, Ian, 2002. "Learning to live with glaucoma: a qualitative study of diagnosis and the impact of sight loss," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 257-267, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:55:y:2002:i:2:p:257-267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(01)00169-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hyde, Abbey & Howlett, Etaoine & Brady, Dympna & Drennan, Jonathan, 2005. "The focus group method: Insights from focus group interviews on sexual health with adolescents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 2588-2599, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:55:y:2002:i:2:p:257-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.