IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v46y1998i12p1553-1567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpreting bodily changes as illness: a longitudinal study of older adults

Author

Listed:
  • Haug, Marie R.
  • Musil, Carol M.
  • Warner, Camille D.
  • Morris, Diana L.

Abstract

Research on elders' health behavior has largely ignored the stage between experiencing a bodily change and defining it as an illness. This paper addresses the question of what explains such definitions of bodily complaints as illness symptoms. The issue is examined in a longitudinal study with a random sample of 350 community dwelling persons aged 65 and over. Multiple regression was used to analyze the effects of external stresses, psychological factors and health attitudes as well as contextual variables, on three types of illness representations. These consisted of giving the bodily changes an illness label, initiating contact with a physician, and/or using some form of self care. These illness representations were treated as outcome variables singularly and in combination. The findings revealed that the overall frequency of a person's bodily changes was the best predictor of an illness designation. Other significant predictors at Time 4 of the study included belief in the seriousness of a complaint, the occurrence of prior illness representations and self-assessed health. This research study on the elderly is unique in that it seeks to explain, within a longitudinal design, the intermediate step between the experience of a bodily change and the definition of the change as an illness.

Suggested Citation

  • Haug, Marie R. & Musil, Carol M. & Warner, Camille D. & Morris, Diana L., 1998. "Interpreting bodily changes as illness: a longitudinal study of older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(12), pages 1553-1567, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:46:y:1998:i:12:p:1553-1567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(98)00010-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:46:y:1998:i:12:p:1553-1567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.