IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v45y1997i2p171-188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is nondashmetropolitan residence a risk factor for poor birth outcome in the U.S.?

Author

Listed:
  • Larson, Eric H.
  • Hart, L. Gary
  • Rosenblatt, Roger A.

Abstract

The association between nondashmetropolitan residence and the risk of poor birth outcome in the United States was examined using the records of 11.06 million singleton births in the United States between 1985 and 1987. Rates of neonatal and post-neonatal death, low birth weight and late prenatal care among nondashmetropolitan residents were compared to the rates among metropolitan residents. The association between residence in a nondashmetropolitan area and the risk of poor birth outcome was assessed in national and state level regression analyses. Residence in a nondashmetropolitan county was not found to be associated with increased risk of low birth weight or neonatal mortality at the national level or in most states, after controlling for several demographic and biological risk factors. Nondashmetropolitan residence was associated with greater risk of post-neonatal mortality at the national level. Nondashmetropolitan residence was strongly associated with late initiation of prenatal care at both the national level and in a majority of the states. Residence in nondashmetropolitan areas does not appear to be associated with higher risk of adverse birth outcome. Regionalization of perinatal care and other changes in the rural health care system may have mitigated the risk associated with residing in areas relatively isolated from tertiary care. High levels of late prenatal care among nondashmetropolitan residents suggest a continuing problem of access to routine care for rural women and their infants that may be associated with higher levels of post-neonatal mortality and childhood morbidity.

Suggested Citation

  • Larson, Eric H. & Hart, L. Gary & Rosenblatt, Roger A., 1997. "Is nondashmetropolitan residence a risk factor for poor birth outcome in the U.S.?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 171-188, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:2:p:171-188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(96)00332-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:2:p:171-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.