IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v43y1996i8p1213-1222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Oral health and quality of life in New Zealand: A social perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Meei-Shia
  • Hunter, Peter

Abstract

This study addresses the social dimensions of oral health by relating oral quality of life (i.e. dental symptoms, perceived oral well-being and oral functioning) to oral health status. We propose a conceptual model which postulates that socioeconomic status, oral health behavior and oral health status each influence oral quality of life. Using data from the New Zealand National Oral Health Survey, we describe and analyze oral health status and oral quality of life among children aged 12-13 and adults aged 35-44 and 65-74. The study demonstrates the impact of oral health problems on the oral quality of life of children, middle-aged adults and older adults in New Zealand. The majority have experienced at least one dental symptom in the past year. Some of them perceive poor oral health and also dislike the way their teeth/dentures look. Various aspects of their social and physical functioning are adversely affected by oral health problems. The results of multiple regression analyses of oral quality of life demonstrate that perceived general health is a consistent predictor of quality of life. Furthermore, the adults' oral quality of life is positively related to asymptomatic dental visits and negatively related to symptomatic dental visits. Children's oral quality of life is positively related to more frequent brushing and flossing. Oral health status is closely associated with oral quality of life for both adults and children. Analyzing the New Zealand oral quality of life data and reviewing previous research findings using a conceptual model provide the possibility for a more comprehensive and integrated understanding of oral quality of life issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Meei-Shia & Hunter, Peter, 1996. "Oral health and quality of life in New Zealand: A social perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1213-1222, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:8:p:1213-1222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(95)00407-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan Michael Bauer & Jörg Schiller & Christopher Schreckenberger, 2020. "Heterogeneous selection in the market for private supplemental dental insurance: evidence from Germany," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 205-231, July.
    2. Lien Nguyen & Unto Häkkinen & Matti Knuuttila & Marjo‐Riitta Järvelin, 2008. "Should we brush twice a day? Determinants of dental health among young adults in Finland," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(2), pages 267-286, February.
    3. Aida Bianco & Silvia Mazzea & Leonzio Fortunato & Amerigo Giudice & Rosa Papadopoli & Carmelo Giuseppe Angelo Nobile & Maria Pavia, 2021. "Oral Health Status and the Impact on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life among the Institutionalized Elderly Population: A Cross-Sectional Study in an Area of Southern Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Bukola G. Olutola & Olalekan A. Ayo-Yusuf, 2012. "Socio-Environmental Factors Associated with Self-Rated Oral Health in South Africa: A Multilevel Effects Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:8:p:1213-1222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.