IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v43y1996i7p1137-1143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is patient-controlled analgesia controlled by the patient?

Author

Listed:
  • Taylor, Neil
  • Hall, George M.
  • Salmon, Peter

Abstract

Using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after surgery, a patient can obtain pain-relieving injections of morphine without the direct involvement of a nurse or doctor. The present study was a response to the conventional view that patients value PCA because of the control which it affords them over their own treatment. Twenty-six patients underwent semi-structured interviews postoperatively, shortly after discontinuation of PCA. Responses were examined qualitatively to identify recurring themes in patients' experience of PCA. Negative as well as positive evaluation was found. PCA was only rarely described as a way of gaining control over analgesia and, in general, this was not valued. Instead, PCA was valued as a way to avoid the difficulty of disclosing pain or securing pain relief within the usual nurse-patient relationship. In turn, PCA strained the nurse-patient relationship where it impeded either the patient's or the nurse's wish for the nurse to take responsibility for pain relief. The results showed that the professionally and theoretically constructed concept of PCA as a method of self-control over pain is inconsistent with patients' experience of it.

Suggested Citation

  • Taylor, Neil & Hall, George M. & Salmon, Peter, 1996. "Is patient-controlled analgesia controlled by the patient?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1137-1143, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:7:p:1137-1143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(96)00056-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:7:p:1137-1143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.