IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v43y1996i2p199-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traditional birth attendants in Mexico: Advantages and inadequacies of care for normal deliveries

Author

Listed:
  • Camey, Xochitl Castañeda
  • Barrios, Cecilia García
  • Guerrero, Xóchitl Romero
  • Nuñez-Urquiza, Rosa María
  • Hernández, Dolores Gonzalez
  • Glass, Ana Langer

Abstract

In Mexico, traditional birth attendants (TBAs) are an essential resource for health care, especially in small rural communities where they attend approximately 45% of all deliveries. Both rural and urban women seek care with the TBAs because, amongst other things, they share the same cultural codes. In this study, qualitative and quantitative methods were used to analyze the concepts, resources and process of care during birth in rural areas of the state of Morelos. Results show that the socio-economic characteristics of the TBAs are similar to those of the patients, that they share the same precarious living conditions, and the resources to which they have access for providing care during births. When choosing a TBA as a health care provider, both the economic aspect and the importance of a shared symbolism come into play. We observed advantages in some of the traditional practices which should be incorporated into the medical system, for example protection through the massage of the perineum at the moment of expulsion. Nevertheless, there are inadequacies for which the implementation of training programs is fundamental, before articulate primary care programs using the TBAs can be promoted.

Suggested Citation

  • Camey, Xochitl Castañeda & Barrios, Cecilia García & Guerrero, Xóchitl Romero & Nuñez-Urquiza, Rosa María & Hernández, Dolores Gonzalez & Glass, Ana Langer, 1996. "Traditional birth attendants in Mexico: Advantages and inadequacies of care for normal deliveries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 199-207, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:2:p:199-207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(95)00362-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:2:p:199-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.